…POWER IS CENTRALIZING

By Al Cronkrite

The world has come to an intersection and is now rolling down a new highway. Major changes are in progress:

The Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement sprang up almost magically as an agent of impending change.

Mary Gabriel, author of the Karl Marx biography “Love and Capital” points to a renewed interest in Karl Marx and the similarity of his era to ours. She cites the industrial revolution as the engine for change in his era and the electronic age in ours.

South Korean economist, Dr. Ha-Joon Chang, a graduate and associate at Cambridge University, wades into the economic foray with terrible diction but a fresh approach.

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), a far left, government financed, change agent, is a source of support for OWS and was previously a domicile for President Obama. Acorn seeks a Red tinted change.

Pregnant with power Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren is running for the Senate in 2012. New York Times writer Jeff Madrick said of her book “The Two Income Trap”, ”The upshot is that two-income families often have even less income left over today than did an equivalent single-income family 30 years ago, even when they make almost twice as much.” Hear here.

We have veered from the highway of the maverick nationalism of Pat Buchanan onto the road to the new world order of David Rockefeller

The World Bank writes about change as if it is a natural evolutionary process but the dethroning of the United States of America and the theft of the wealth of its citizens has been planned and executed over a period of several decades by stealth and treachery. The exact source remains opaque but the results are clearly visible. Elections have not had nor will they have any effect on the process which proceeds inexorably regardless of political party.

All efforts to stop this evil plan will fail. Even with the mass resistance to the coddling of illegal aliens we have lost the State of California and citizens across the country remain harnessed to supporting foreigners who are breaking our laws and are intent on overthrowing our government. If we cannot solve the immigration problem how can we expect to be successful against the mysterious progress of world government?

We are fighting a powerful, invisible enemy with the useless weapons of a shredded Constitution and loud complaints. We listen to the interminable remedial rhetoric of political candidates which seems to provide solutions but when the candidate is elected the promises are forgotten and the office holder quickly cow tows to the mysterious powers that seek to destroy us. It has been repeated over and over again with the same results. In this video Adam Kokesh interviews a warmongering woman who when confronted with the truth simply walks away. She, like most Americans, cannot and will not hear the truth! This serious malady is rampant at the bottom and at the top.

Kevin Barrett interviews columnist and former presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, confronting him with serious questions about 9/11 (Near the end). Buchanan stubbornly refuses to consider either the thought or the evidence.

Someone recently sent me this beautiful rendition of the Battle Hymn of the Republic. It is a beautiful song but it is also pure propaganda. Our Triune Christian God supports neither illegal wars nor the armies that carry them out. The mass murder of millions of human beings created in His image is an unimaginable abomination.

The Daily Bell recently published an article that referred to the injustices (Genocide) done to the American Indians. Christians assume that God’s blessing is detached from behavior and like the Pharisees arrogantly cling to their erroneous assumptions. With pompous righteousness we decorate the bumpers of our cars with stickers that read “God Bless America” falsely assuming that He will bless us on demand without regard for our behavior.

There are demonstrations going on around the world, Egypt, Syria, Greece, and now in the United States. The demonstrations may bring a change in government but the change will be toward consolidation of power, not toward freedom. Greece has installed a new government that will consolidate power and bring Greece back in the European Union.

The OWS demonstrations here in the United States are ostensibly leaderless but if these demonstrations continue order will come through a tyrannical consolidation of conspiratorial power.

The viable candidates for president of the United States are already bought and paid for. It makes no difference whether Obama is re-elected or Gingrich or Romney is successful, the loss of freedom and the destruction of our nation will continue unabated. Complaints that the Constitution is being ignored will continue to fall on deaf ears. New travesties will constantly appear. We will complain but our complaints will be ignored.

Though you will not like it and may not be able to hear it let the ancient prophet Jeremiah tell you why we are losing our freedom and our nation is being destroyed. “O Lord do not Thine eyes look for truth? Thou has smitten them, but they did not weaken; Thou hast consumed them, but they refused to take correction. They have made their faces harder than rock; they have refused to repent.” Jeremiah chapter 5 verse 3.

Consider, gentle reader, that in all the political discourse there is no reference to the Creator or to His Law. There is no effort to bring politics under the jurisdiction of the Great God of All Creation. Instead we look to His egotistical, erratic, sinful, political creatures to solve our national problems. Failing to understand that Christians are usually part of the problem we think that the solution is to get Christian men elected to high positions.

Over nearly five decades of captivity to Christ I have been betrayed, cheated, maligned, and condemned more times by Christians than by pagans. Antinomian Christians are often more dangerous than pagans because we expect more from them than their level of maturity warrants.

It is the refusal to be corrected and the refusal to repent that sets God’s face against the United States of America. Loss of freedom is a punishment from God; it was in ancient Israel and still is today. God is not blessing America; we are losing our freedom!

The Christian Church is the center of God’s judgment. When the Church begins to face reality, recognize the crown on the head of King Jesus, and preach obedience, then freedom will commence to return. Unfortunately, humility is scarce and there is no evidence that repentance and obedience are close at hand. We are traveling on a dark road. Governments killed more of their own people during the Twentieth Century than have died in all the wars of history. Elements involved with the OWS movement would gleefully wipe out the White Race.

“Published originally at EtherZone.com

Al Cronkrite is a free-lance writer from Florida. He a is regular columnist for Ether Zone.
We also invite you to visit his website - http://www.verigospel.com

Al Cronkrite can be reached at: fmsinfla@hotmail.com

 

WesternFront America

In Paris on October 15th, a group of finance ministers and central bankers known as the G20, representing major nations, gave the European Union until October 23red to find an answer to the financial crisises that are tearing apart the EU and its monetary structure.

Don’t hold your breath. If not now, at least in the foreseeable future, the EU will collapse for the oldest reason, national sovereignty and national self-interest.

If you visit Wikipedia and enter “European Wars”, it will kick out a list that’s several pages long in small print starting with the Trojan Wars, 1193-1184 BC. The Romans conquered everyone for a while. The Spanish tried to invade England. For a while Napoleon was invading everyone. There were the hundred year wars, thirty year wars, and wars for the hell of it. Suffice to say the Europeans have a long record of going to war with one another.

World War One impoverished its participants and led to World War Two. After the devastation of World War Two and with the threat of the Soviet Union to the East, European leaders concluded that the only option to avoid future wars or being overrun by the Russian bear was to form a kind of United States of Europe.

In a newly published book, “The End of the Euro”, subtitled “The uneasy future of the European Union”, Dr. Johan Van Overtveldt, the editor-in-chief of Trends, Belgium’s leading weekly on business and economics, takes us through the history of the European Union and the creation of a common currency, the euro.

For people like me who thank a merciful God that Internet banking makes it possible to actually know my checking account balance, Overtveldt’s book is both a blessing and a challenge because it deals with some very complex issues of finance. He also provides some very useful history with which to understand the past and predict the future.

My knowledge of history was sufficient to have huge doubts about the formation of the European Union and it looks like I am about to be borne out in my pessimism. “While efforts at European integration have without question contributed to peace on the continent,” Overtveldt points out, “at least three other factors are also at play.”

“First, broader international cooperation and consultation” have been the order of the day since the end of World War Two. “Second, the presence of American troops throughout Europe, and certainly in Germany, helped maintain the military status quo. Third, the sense during the Cold War of “a common, non-democratic enemy increased cooperation and cohesion among Western European nations.”

Then Overtveldt identifies the central weakness of the European Union. “History teaches us that, in particular, the lack of real political union is a major barrier to the durability of a monetary union and its single currency.”

The problem of the EU and the euro “is the loss of an independent monetary policy” because what works for Germany does not necessarily work for France, Spain, Italy, and the other EU members.

This has become abundantly evident as Greece totters on default of its debts and the contagion of a sovereign debt crisis threatens to spread. Simply said, the Germans are not inclined to want to “bail out” the Greeks because the Germans have a wide conservative streak when it comes to the conduct of their financial affairs while the Greeks were inclined to fudge the books and run up a huge debt.

In addition to Greece, Portugal and Ireland are likely to find that they have no choice except to leave the EU and Spain, Italy, and Belgium have their problems, too. For that matter, add France to the list.

The U.S. financial crisis no doubt sped up the process, but our government bailed out the banks for the simple reason there never was a choice not to. One or two big investment banks were allowed to fail, others were forcibly merged, but a nation without a functioning banking system is nothing but lines on a map.

In a recent column by Patrick J. Buchanan, titled “Is the New World Order unraveling?” he notes the rise of “economic nationalism” in Europe as well as warning against the foolish American trend of signing away our sovereign rights by joining globalist organizations from the United Nations to the World Trade Organization, along with a slew of treaties and agreements.

The export of whole U.S. industries has been one result “while emerging powers like China, India, and Brazil are demanding to be exempt from restrictions developed countries seek to impose.” The world is a nasty place in which to live. The Moon and other planets, however, are less habitable and do not have cable TV.

As Americans vainly look to their Congress to redress its own authorization of the spending excesses of present and past administrations, the rest of the world, protected by our military strength and moral values, has decided it no longer has to pay us the attention it did in former times.

So we shall surely witness the end of the euro and the European Union as that continent returns to its normal levels of national self-interest that one might argue are not a bad thing in a competitive world. So long, of course, as those nations do not decide to declare war on one another.

© Alan Caruba, 2011

 

WesternFront America

With the US and the world economy in such a sad state it may seem somewhat ridiculous to be worrying aloud about whether or not the United Nations recognizes Palestine as a state. But believe me, it is one of the moments in history that can be spoken of and will be written of as a “tipping point.” It is so important that the vote itself may well produce a new world order.

I continue to believe the Palestinians are not nearly so interested in a state of their own as they are in totally destroying the state of Israel.

There is a heck of a lot of history behind this Palestinian and Israeli conflict. Let’s review a bit of that history.

Did you know that the area and the people, erroneously called Palestinians, were offered a state of their own back in the 1930’s? Bet you didn’t know that.

It seems we have to go over the history of the rejected Palestinian state over and over and I can only surmise the public school system and the university and college systems in the US simply don’t teach it!

Look, the plain truth is… the people, calling themselves Palestinians, have been offered a state of their own at least three times since the 1936 Arab revolt. They have flatly turned it down every time! Yes! The first offer made by the Peel Commission in the 1930s offered them a vast piece of real estate much larger than that offered to the Jews… and … they turned it down!

UN Resolution 181 passed soon after the Second World War gave Israel 55% of the so-called Palestine and the Palestinians 45%. The Jews accepted and in doing so recognized that Palestine would become a state next door to them. They accepted that. But the Arabs rejected it, flat out, and started another war against the Jews, which they promptly lost.

It has been 60 years now and the whining and moaning is still coming from the “woe is me” crowd who called themselves Palestinians.

The problems between Israel and the Palestinians are not because Israel has settled some disputed land. No! The cause of all the trouble in that “center of the earth” strip of land is due entirely to the Arabs refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish state called Israel, or called anything else, for that matter. That is the crux of the problem.

“Right of Return” is far more dangerous to the state of Israel than an all out attack by their Arab neighbors. You’re going to hear more and more about the Palestinians demand for a Right of Return.

So what is the Right of Return? “The idea of the right of return is to demand that Israel allow the descendants of the 750,000 Palestinians who were displaced in 1948 and their families (which now stands at almost 4 million) back into Israel and give them full compensation for their troubles. Even if only half of these Palestinians returned, it would alter Israel’s identity as a Jewish state and effectively create a second Palestinian state. One assumption made under the right of return is that all the Arabs that lived in Israel proper were forcibly expelled from their homes in 1947 and 48. This is a myth. While historians know for a fact that a small number of the 750,000 displaced Arabs were forcibly expelled by Zionist militias (a famous example being Deir Yassin), honest and impartial historians also know that a large number of this 750,000 strong population left on their own, either to avoid an upcoming war between the Zionists and the Arabs, or to join the Arabs in the fighting against the newly established state.” (From: http://www.themiddleeastnow.com/nopalestinianstate.html)

The Palestinians will obfuscate, and delay, and continue to carry on their war to wipe Israel from the face of the map. They will use any means to do it. This requested vote in the UN is just another tool they will use in their never ending attempt to destroy Israel.

So why do I continue to insist that a Palestinian state will lead, almost immediately, to war between Israel and the State of Palestine? The answer is so simple it is appalling to me that the world does not see it.

Look, the moment Palestine occupies a piece of ground that is considered strategic to the survival of Israel the shooting war will begin. When the war begins there will be a re-alignment of nations supporting both the Palestinians and the Israelis. The nations of the world will be, once again, at each other’s throats.

So, YES, this coming vote in the UN is important in the extreme. I do not think it possible to over estimate just how important it is to the entire world.

The Palestinians are running a “con game” on the entire world and on the UN in particular. Otherwise, they would have taken their request to the General Assembly where that would have won, at least, “Observer State” status most likely in an overwhelming vote. But instead — they are said now to have decided to take their request to the UN Security Council where it is sure to be vetoed by, at least, the United States. Why? Because if the US vetoes it, THAT will be considered a political victory for the Palestinians and will add another tool to their arsenal for use against Israel AND the United States.

That maneuver alone should underscore that their intent is not so much statehood as it is the total destruction of the state of Israel.

If the nations of the world want the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian to end, then they should get out of the way and allow them to go at each other until one or the other is wiped out. As a student of history, I have no doubt who will be standing when the dust clears.

J. D. Longstreet

 

WesternFront America

“This is a defining moment for conservatism.”

Sean Hannity

So many in the media have acquiesced to the notion that the United States of America should just “shut up” and allow the Mexican annexation of American territory, through a Mexican lebensborn movement called “anchor baby.” These media talking heads live in a surreal world, where it is “politically correct” to surrender to a hostile foreign power, bent on invasion and conquest of the United States of America.

In short, most of the news anchors on television have NOT had the courage to stand up and defy their corporate handlers by taking a position with teeth to it. They have comported themselves as media chippies and corporate jumping jacks, in service to Big Brother’s “New World Order.”

The real truth about the press was revealed some time ago by John Swinton, who wrote:

“There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it will never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”

- John Swinton, Former Chief of Staff of the New York Times, called by his peers “The Dean of his profession”, was asked in 1953 to give a toast before the New York Press Club

Think about what this journalist said about selling his race and country down the river.

Millions of Mexican nationals now infest the United States of America as an occupation army, while treasonous scum like Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, think it appropriate to collude with the Reconquista of American territory by Mexico, in this Second Mexican War.

It has become glaringly apparent to the American people that both men are quislings against their country and should be removed from public office for their blatant treason against the United States of America.

If this writer had his way, he would “adjust the model” by seeing both senators legally tried for sedition by a United States military court. That would get these two scoundrels “right with the law.”

These two political mediocrities have selected hearing, for their ears have been stopped by corporate wax and they ostensibly “do not hear” the anguished cries of the American people, for an end to the fire sale of this great country. Their megalomania is transparent to Americans, who have finally opted to step up to the plate and finger them for their direct responsibility in the deaths of thousands of Americans, at the hands of illegal alien interlopers.

John McCain the Stinker, refused to answer a direct question by two constituents regarding the statistics on illegal alien crime perpetrated against American citizens by Mexican nationals who have breached our borders. These constituents were told to “shut up.”

So much for the “straight talk express” of John McCain.

McCain is living proof that NO former POW should be allowed to hold public office, due to the Manchurian Candidate Syndrome inherent in such a proposition. John McCain had his brain washed into silly putty by his North Vietnamese captors. Now all of America must suffer from his derangement syndrome.

This blog is not about John Sidney McCain III, the failed presidential candidate, but more of an overview of what still plagues this country in the form of incompetent leadership. Sean Hannity is the one American who now steps forward as a leader in the press, where there was no one before.

Any man who fashions himself a patriot and a conservative, must “henceforth” NOT pledge allegiance to the United Nations, but rather commit himself to the final abandonment of the faux neoconservative philosophy of free trade, “comprehensive immigration reform” and endless immigration. These alien anti-American ideas must be excised from the basic tenets of conservatism, lest our country become a petting zoo for serfs of the Third World.

Sean Hannity also acknowledged that Ronald Wilson Reagan made a huge mistake, by granting amnesty to illegal aliens in 1986. Now thousands of the American victims of these Mexican nationals must be heard, even though their voices have been silenced forever, by those Mexican nationals and those inept politicians who thought they were “going to tell the ‘bigots’ to shut up.”

It is the American people who are most deserving of any alleged “amnesty” from the marauding Mexican scarecrows, who came in the name of “La Reconquista” to annex American territory for Mexico.

The American people understand that it is a race war between the United States of America and Mexico, while the “politically correct” Bolshevik commissars in Washington, District of Criminals, do not.

True “comprehensive immigration reform” is holding Mexico accountable for the invasion of the United States of America and doing something about it. This requires “regime change” in Washington.

Sean Hannity has taken a stand for the American people and for that he is worthy of veneration and immortal gratitude from his countrymen. Now America knows there is at least one honest journalist who will side with the American people.

This blog salutes and honors Mr. Hannity, with the same gratefulness blacks felt for President Abraham Lincoln on emancipation.

© Thor H. Asgardson

 

WesternFront America

By Joanne Mandel

In his run for the presidency in 2004, Sen. John Kerry caused a stir when he mentioned the need for the US government to submit to a “global test” before taking military action. Promoting the UN as arbiter of American policy is a basic position for globalists who seek to establish the UN as the final authority over all nations. But that is rarely mentioned publicly. Advocates prefer to work toward their goal without attracting the attention of potential critics. However, one critic did ask a crucial question: “So which body and set of rules are to govern Americans – the U.S. Congress and the laws it passes? Or the U.N. and its conference declarations?” – John O’Sullivan, 2005.

Most Americans assume that we will continue to live as free men and women, governed by laws we have consented to through our elected representatives. They would be shocked to find themselves increasingly governed by UN declarations established by a global elite. New York attorney Joseph Klein, a Harvard Law grad has explained why we should pay special attention to the goings on at the UN in Global Deception – The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom.

When former Secretary General Kofi Annan asserted in 1999 that the United Nations Security Council is the “sole source of legitimacy on the use of force,” dismissing America’s right to use force to protect our vital national interests, his claim went unchallenged by the Clinton administration. Mr. Klein had long applauded the UN as the place where nations forge peaceful solutions to global problems. But he felt that the UN had moved in a dangerous new direction: quietly maneuvering to establish itself as the final authority on foreign and domestic policy for all nations. It was this utopian design, not discussed by the media though surely newsworthy, that led to publishing a book that would shed light on this unprecedented assault on Western democratic traditions. Confirmation of those utopian designs comes from Stroub Talbott, deputy secretary of state in the Clinton administration, who has just published The Great Experiment (2009), “an appeal for progress toward global governance under the auspices of the United Nations,” according to Publishers Weekly.

Mr. Klein regards the ongoing assault on the sovereign power of nations as the most serious threat posed by the UN, and particularly a threat to the military power of United States [Israel and Britain]. Global Deception was written in 2005 to alert Americans to the way global governance enthusiasts are employing innocent sounding UN policy documents and declarations to expand the authority of the United Nations, while undermining our constitutional system of self-government. Under the proposed regime, all people will be citizens of the world,” or more accurately, all people will be reduced to being merely “subjects of the world.” And this could come about long before most Americans have heard a word about it. In July of 2009 former Vice President Al Gore told a conference in the United Kingdom that “cap-and-trade” legislation will lead to “global governance.” News worthy? Not to the mainstream press.

For this new world order to be put in place, America’s power and position must first be neutralized. That is being accomplished through entangling the US legal system in the restrictions and obligations imposed by acceptance of a series of UN treaties, conventions, agreements and protocols. It is reminiscent of the entanglement of the sleeping Gulliver by the Lilliputians in Gulliver’s Travels. Though few are aware of their work, globalists [proponents of global governance] have been trying to reduce the US to being no more than “one nation among many” for years. Toward that end they now claim that UN declarations constitute “international law” and as such they supercede US domestic law and the Constitution.

During the previous administration several attempts to whittle away American sovereignty were blocked, as when President George W. Bush unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and the International Criminal Court Treaty, considering the treaties harmful to US interests. The current president’s concern with improving America’s image in the international community makes a gradual transfer of decision-making power to the UN and its agencies more likely. A number of treaties awaiting Senate ratification including the Convention on Eliminating All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the International Criminal Court Treaty (ICC) will provide ample opportunity to polish our national image.

Unlike traditional international law that dealt with relations betweensovereign nations, the updated version being crafted at United Nations conclaves is designed to intervene in the relationship of a government and its people. John Fonte in “Democracy’s Trojan Horse” 2004 shows us what awaits nations that accept UN treaties. The concepts of national sovereignty, our federal system of government and the supremacy of the Constitution have no standing in UN inspired treaties. The Convention on Eliminating All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) requires UN compliance committees to monitor efforts to achieve strict gender equality in countries that have signed the treaty. For many years UN teams have been correcting the shortcomings uncovered in countries that ratified the treaty. The UN inspectors have advised the British government that not enough men are taking parental leave. The Slovenian is falling short of UN standards because not enough children are in state-run day care centers. The Belgian workforce still includes jobs that are dominated by men. CEDAW teams of compliance officers are advancing a radical feminist agenda throughout the non-Muslim world.

Senate ratification of the International Criminal Court Treaty would further undermine the US legal system by depriving Americans charged by an ICC pre-trial chamber with war crimes or crimes against humanity of the constitutional protections granted to the accused in US courts. The safeguards of the US Constitution would be trumped by the jurisdictional claims of the ICC and international law. Global Deception has a fascinating account of the way this all embracing court was established. Roughly 2,000 progressive minded special interest groups (a.k.a. non-governmental organizations, NGOs) met in Rome in 1998 to establish a permanent world court with universal jurisdiction. With sponsorship from the UN and a number of member nations, the Rome Statute establishing the ICC was instituted and began its work in 2002. The attending NGOs which included Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch along with self-selected activists played leading roles in the deliberations. They served on rule-making committees and drafted the policy statements that they then proclaimed to be “customary international law.” Few Americans have any idea that the legal arrangements we are to be governed by are being rewritten in a way that puts our collective right to govern ourselves, our national sovereignty, in greater jeopardy with each successive UN conference. Conference participants who are determined to impose their own elevated insight on humanity are able to downgrade the nation-state and its electorate to a subordinate role in world affairs and impair their ability to direct their own lives.

Eye-opening evidence of UN influence and involvement in setting US public policy was brought to light in a 2008 article: “Our Global Big Brother,” by Henry Lamb, Chairman of Sovereignty International. Legislative and regulatory initiatives that reflect the interests of an international elite prevail over the concerns of ordinary Americans. US land use policy is rooted in the UN Conference on Human Settlements; US wetland policy owes much to the Ramsar Convention of Wetlands; laws related to endangered species arise from The UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. Under this enlightened regime, California’s San Joaquin Valley is being transformed into a dust bowl as water is being diverted from farms and people to rivers and streams to protect the Delta smelt, a three-inch bait fish. Consistent with this intrusive pattern, we learn that the Community Reinvestment Act, which essentially forced banks to offer mortgages to unqualified applicants and ultimately served as the linchpin in the current financial collapse, was spurred on by an outgrowth of the UN’s International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

There is an impressive list of little noticed big successes for well-funded special interest groups who think the habitat of the snail darter should take precedence over the rights of the human property owner; rights intended to secure property, the fruit of man’s labor. Their ability to trample the constitutional rights of property ownership owes much to the proposals being worded so vaguely that there appears to be no reason for any objection. But especially, their success is made possible by the collaboration of left-leaning NGOs who are unelected, unaccountable advocates with the like-minded mainstream media who demonstrate no interest in enlightening their audience about these matters. Most Americans, uninformed and unaware, could not possibly object because they do not know that the freedom to responsibly direct their own lives is likely to be transferred to UN bureaucrats eager to take command in their stead. Consider that The Convention on the Rights of the Child states that “no child shall be subject to arbitrary….interference [by parents] with his or her privacy…or correspondence.” And that an agency has been estabished to enforce the UN authorized “basic rights of the child.”

A forceful anti-American, anti-capitalist movement that seeks to undermine US dominance has another strategy for bringing America down to size: international law introduced by American jurists. Several left-leaning federal judges have already incorporated elements of it in their written opinions, which has put pressure on the court to bring US law into full conformity with “international law.” This, too, is an end-run around the democratic process. Without that bulwark of freedom, we could someday find ourselves without the right to free speech, the right to defend ourselves, if attacked and to impose the death penalty. With four and occasionally, five Supreme Court Justices open to consideration of international “legal norms,” globalists have found another path to their ultimate goal: a utopian paradise on earth where those who know best are in charge.

The question – which set of rules is to govern our nation? – is of supreme importance. The forces working to put an end to our emancipation have to be challenged. Those who want to live as free men and women rather than as indentured servants had best not sit back and assume that liberty is their birthright.

©2009 Joanne Mandel

 

WesternFront America

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it’s indifference.

– Elie Wiesel

Anybody that can enlighten the people, motivate the people is a danger to the New World Order.

– Michael Savage, Aug. 24, 2009

The enduring words of Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor of Hitler’s death camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, are a poignant reminder that bombs, bullets, tanks, torture and gas chambers are not the most the demonstrative examples of hatred of man against humanity. It is, after those ghastly, terroristic acts are perpetrated against the innocent, that those who are in a position to say something, to do something to stop such senseless genocide, are all too quiet … too indifferent of the plight of another.

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.

Scotland has recently received tepid condemnation by President Obama and many world leaders for releasing Lockerbie bomber Abdulbaset al-Megrahi, a Muslim fanatic responsible for the deaths of 270 innocent people in the bombing of Pan AM flight 103 which ignited as the plane flew over Lockerbie, Scotland, just before Christmas 1988.

The international controversy was due to Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi giving the Lockerbie bomber a hero’s welcome much to the chagrin of America, Britain and Scotland. In a U.K. Guardian article, it was reported that “the Scottish government … responded defiantly, insisting the U.S. had made clear in discussions that, while it opposed Megrahi’s release, it regarded freeing him on compassionate grounds because of his terminal cancer as “far preferable” to a prisoner transfer deal that would have seen him in custody.”

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.

Last week my friend and intellectual mentor, Michael Savage, at hearing news of the egregious insult Scotland and Britain did against the families of the Lockerbie bombing victims, as well as against all Americans by releasing this murderous terrorist, rightfully drew the parallel on his radio show between the secrecy and duplicitous treachery of the governments of Scotland and Britain for what appears to be a quid pro quo for oil contracts with Libya, and how Michael Savage was unjustly banned in Britain and essentially put on an enemies list because of his conservative ideology and his Jewish heritage. Perhaps we will later learn through legal discovery that ranking members of the Obama administration thought blacklisting Savage would be a Machiavellian pretext for their real objective – the official banning of conservative talk radio in America via the so-called “Fairness Doctrine.”

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.

If the Obama administration is anything, these Chicago thugs are Machiavellian to the core. Putting Michael Savage’s name on an enemies list was not by accident. He was specifically singled out because he is the most effective, singular voice against the fascist tactics of “The Chicago Way” in American media. Savage is an existential threat to Obama’s power which this arrogant, political opportunist cannot abide.

The Obama administration knew that professional jealously, divide-and-conquer tactics and what the Germans call Schadenfreude would continue to isolate and marginalize Savage. Philosopher and sociologist, Theodor Adorno, defined Schadenfreude as “largely unanticipated delight in the suffering of another which is cognized as trivial and/or appropriate.” Obama’s minions knew that the GOP, the RNC, Rush, Fox News, et al., would take delight in the plight of Michael Savage’s suffering at this vile international attack upon his character because his conservative colleagues on talk radio, like effete harlequins or the tragic figure, Dorian Gray, are transfixed by their own outward reflection even as they rot from inside by their hypocritical silence.

As it was with the Michael Savage affair, so it was with the Lockerbie bombing affair: utmost secrecy and treachery from the Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s administration as evidence mounts that Brown had “discussed with Colonel Gaddafi detailed conditions for the Lockerbie bomber’s return nearly six weeks ago” during the G-8 Summit in Italy. That “when we met [there] I stressed that, should the Scottish executive decide that Megrahi can return to Libya, this should be a purely private family occasion” rather than a public celebration. And that those conditions centered around giving Britain access to Libya’s lucrative oil reserves.

Where is the left on this issue? Where is Cindy Sheehan and the useful idiots of the environmental movement with their “No blood for oil” signs?

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.

The article continues: “Tonight the shadow foreign secretary, William Hague, redoubled calls for the government to release official records of conversations about the release, as Gaddafi increased the embarrassment by publicly thanking “my friend Brown, his government, the Queen of Britain, Elizabeth, and Prince Andrew who all contributed to encouraging the Scottish government to take this historic and courageous decision.”

Can you appreciate the bitter irony of the once great British Empire of Queen Elizabeth I and Sir Winston Churchill has devolved down to the buffoonery of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Andrew colluding with her puppet government, Scotland, to release an unrepentant Muslim murder with the blood of 270 Americans still on his hands, so that England can get oil contracts from Libya, while the Jew, Michael Savage, an American patriot and self-confessed Anglophile is on England’s enemies list demanding that he recants statements and ideas he never espoused?

While Chairman Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown beg for legitimacy and approval by wishing one billion Muslims “Happy Ramadan,” can you imagine in 1940 Winston Churchill wishing Hitler and the Nazi empire “Happy Kristallnacht” during the Battle of Britain? America! We are at war with the liberal-Muslim axis powers of the Obama administration, the ACLU, CAIR and these fascists want to silence our strongest voice of truth.

Why is the Lockerbie bomber praised while Michael Savage is hated and unjustly put on an enemies list while the conservative and state-controlled media are silent?

Because the opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.

© Ellis Washington

Ellis Washington, authorized biographer for the conservative intellectual Dr. Michael Savage (see www.MichaelSavage.com), is former editor of the Michigan Law Review and law clerk at The Rutherford Institute. He is a graduate of John Marshall Law School and a lecturer and freelance writer on constitutional law, legal history, political philosophy and critical race theory. He has written over a dozen law review articles and several books, including “The Inseparability of Law and Morality: The Constitution, Natural Law and the Rule of Law” (2002). See his law review article “Reply to Judge Richard Posner.” Washington’s latest book is “The Nuremberg Trials: Last Tragedy of the Holocaust.”

 

WesternFront America