|
WesternFront America Contributors:
Thor H. Asgardson | Clay Bowler | Judie Brown | Alan Caruba | Dajjal | Denise | Paul Driessen | Doug Edelman | Diane Grassi | David M. Huntwork | Jesse James | Calvin E. Johnson | Left Coast Rebel | Marie Jon | J.D. Longstreet | Joanne Mandel | Ron W. Marr | Jesse Mathewson | Dr. Frederick Meekins | Matt Ross | Michael R. Shannon | Prof. Nicholas Stix | Dr. Ellis Washington | Guest Articles |
Just when you thought it was safe to send your children to school, the Jennings scandal expands yet again. Several days ago, Big Government broke the story that the Jennings led GLSEN passed out directories to school aged kids attending GLSEN events. The directories contained addresses to gay bars and anonymous sex clubs. Here is their coverage…
Agree with them or not, they seem to be saying that they want to end discrimination. Sort of nice and harmless, right? Well, there is far more to the story than meets the eye. GLSEN has a recommended reading list for kids, and the content of the books involved seem to go far beyond the stated mission of the organization.
By now, we know exactly what ‘Safe Schools Czar’ Kevin Jennings wants in the curricula of schools across the country. You don’t write the forward to a book titled Queering Elementary Education without an agenda. But did we hear one peep about Jennings being tied to everyone’s favorite globalist George Soros? Yep. You read that right.
According to World Net Daily, it has come to light that Jennings has had nothing but praise for NAMBLA founder Harry Hay who passed away in 2002.
In a 1997 speech, Jennings is quoted as saying, “One of the people that’s always inspired me is Harry Hay, who started the first ongoing gay rights groups in America. In 1948, he tried to get people to join the Mattachine Society. It took him two years to find one other person who would join.”
According to moral relativism, it makes no sense to ask the abstract question whether a given act is good or bad. According to moral relativism, there is no goodness or badness in the abstract; there is only goodness or badness within a specified context. An act may thus be good for one person but bad for another, or good in one cultural setting but bad in another, but cannot be either good or bad full stop.
![Recommend [HansGruen]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/02me.png){kind=icon}
