|
WesternFront America Contributors:
Thor H. Asgardson | Clay Bowler | Judie Brown | Alan Caruba | Dajjal | Denise | Paul Driessen | Doug Edelman | Diane Grassi | David M. Huntwork | Jesse James | Calvin E. Johnson | Left Coast Rebel | Marie Jon | J.D. Longstreet | Joanne Mandel | Ron W. Marr | Jesse Mathewson | Dr. Frederick Meekins | Matt Ross | Michael R. Shannon | Prof. Nicholas Stix | Dr. Ellis Washington | Guest Articles |
It is alleged, because of the Supreme Court’s January 21 decision, that the present court is violating the tradition of the Court as it pertains to “reverence” for stare decisis. Those who criticize the court for going against precedent are placing stare decisis as an end in and of itself, rather than justice or constitutionality.
Today, more than ever, we must persist in this vein. We must do so through patient teaching and positive motivation, so that we bring as many Americans along with us as we can. By so doing, we are confident that America will witness a day when human rights are recognized for all human persons from their biological beginning to their natural—not imposed—death.
The nature of pandering to politicians with half-measures while announcing to pro-life troops that a victory has been achieved is not a new malady. It has been a relatively consistent pattern woven into National Right to Life Committee politics for many years now. The problem with what is currently being said about the Stupak Amendment is the most egregious I have seen.
Let’s start with the fact that every female human being has a right to know exactly what is at stake if she ingests a chemical to have sexual relations (theoretically, without consequences) or chooses to pay someone to abort her own child. She deserves respect, honesty and integrity from those she confides in when seeking information or asking questions about matters that will impact her for the rest of her life.
![Recommend [HansGruen]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/02me.png){kind=icon}
