By Selwyn Duke

According to Department of Justice whistleblower J. Christian Adams, AG Eric Holder has a certain something in his wallet. It is a quotation – and he has carried it for decades. It essentially says, to quote Adams, “Blackness is more important than anything, and the black US attorney has common cause with the black criminal.” It’s not surprising that Holder would feel this way about black lawyers and criminals.

Because in his case they’re one and the same.

Holder, the man whose misfeasance led him to drop the infamous Black Panther voter-intimidation case, now may have done what all corrupt men, sooner or later, eventually do. He has tripped up in his efforts to hide his misdeeds.

The issue stems from the Fast and Furious scandal, which refers to a gun-walking operation in which ATF officials allowed thousands of firearms to make their way to Mexican drug-cartel criminals. The operation was brought to light after a border-control agent named Brian Terry was murdered last December – and two US-government-supplied weapons were discovered at the scene. And what was Holder’s involvement? Writes CBSNews.com:

On May 3, 2011, Holder told a Judiciary Committee hearing, “I’m not sure of the exact date, but I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.”

Yet internal Justice Department documents show that at least ten months before that hearing, Holder began receiving frequent memos discussing Fast and Furious.

Note, again, that these were “frequent memos.”

Of course, Holder is now trying to massage the issue. The DOJ’s latest line is, writes CBS News, “Holder misunderstood that question [about when he learned of the operation] from the committee – he did know about Fast and Furious – just not the details.”

This nonsensical cop-out speaks for itself, so let’s discuss the reality of the matter. Holder could have lied to the Judiciary Committee. The other possibility is that he is suffering memory loss and is so incompetent that he didn’t brief himself on a brewing major scandal on which he was going to testify in front of a congressional committee. I’m betting I know which one is the answer.

The Republicans now want to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Holder and his fast-and-furious dance of deception. And I say, dig long and dig deep. Because with the amount of dirt in Holder’s closet, you’ll find that Obama has created at least one shovel-ready job.

As for my title, it may seem odd jumping from Holder’s bigotry to his alleged criminality. But it’s as with powerful 1920s KKK leader D.C. Stephenson, who, while claiming to be a defender of morality and womanhood, ended up brutally raping and killing a lady named Madge Oberholtzer. Bigotry is a sign of personal corruption – and it usually doesn’t end there.

And I’ll conclude by making a request of our post-racial president’s attorney general. Mr. Holder, you once said that Americans were “cowards” in the area of race. Well, then, brave man, do you have the sand to come out of the closet? Produce that card from your wallet; proudly proclaim the beliefs you’ve long held so dear. Or is it that, deep down, the color other than red that epitomizes you most is yellow?

“Published originally at EtherZone.com

Selwyn Duke is a writer, columnist and public speaker whose work has been published widely online and in print, on both the local and national levels. He has been featured on the Rush Limbaugh Show and has been a regular guest on the award-winning Michael Savage Show. His work has appeared in Pat Buchanan’s magazine The American Conservative and he writes regularly for The New American and Christian Music Perspective. He is a regular contributor to Ether Zone.
Selwyn Duke can be reached at: SelwynDuke@optonline.net

 

WesternFront America

The Council Of The Religious Leaders Of Metropolitan Chicago have released a statement condemning the Arizona immigration law.

Given that Chicago is perennially going to hell in a handbasket because of its high crime rate and the legendary corruption of the city’s municipal authorities, you’d think these clergymen would be too busy to comment on affairs taking place halfway across the country.

Perhaps conservative pastors in Arizona with virtually no connections to Chicago whatsoever should hand down as a group their own lengthy proclamation as to what they perceive as to the shortcomings of Obama’s adopted hometown.

A fuss is being made over the abandoned boyhood home of Mitt Romney being torn down. Any other time the power of government to snatch homes from people is heralded as a wonderful sign of progress and anyone thinking otherwise had better remain silent or they will be labeled as one of those “Tea Party Terrorists”.

When questioned by a member of Congress, Attorney General Eric Holder was unable to admit that radical Islam is responsible for the vast majority of terrorist attacks upon the United States. Can you imagine in the 1940′s what a mess this country would be in if its highest officials were unable to even enunciate how we were at war with Germany or Japan?

I bet these Obamaphiles have no problem about saying things against White folks, Christianity, and the Tea Party movement. If George Bush is to be derided as an intellectual lightweight because of his rumored aversion to dense lengthy tomes, isn’t Eric Holder even more of a mental nit for failing to read the Arizona immigration law despite proceeding to make pronouncements on it in an almost ex-cathedra fashion as America’s highest practicing barrister?

Contrary to Pope Pelosi, the Gospel is about Jesus as the only Begotten Son Of God dying for our sins and rising from the dead so that we might have eternal life in Heaven. It says very little about immigration and more about complying with the law through the doctrine of rendering to Caesar.

The United Nations is plotting to impose an Internet tax in the name of providing health services to poor countries. However, why should average Americans be punished because jungle savages can’t keep their pants on (or perhaps rather leaves) and keep having kids they obviously can’t afford to provide for?

CBS laments how the Times Square bomber didn’t get to experience the American dream. Just think of how many American dreams would not have been realized if this piece of human debris had been successful.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagin opposes the military, Christianity, the unborn, traditional marriage, and free speech. Thus, any Republican that votes in the affirmative for her opposes these things also. If Orin Hatch votes to confirm Kagin to the Supreme Court, he is as much an enemy of the Constitution as Obama and Kagin.

If student mobs today are permitted to foist Mexican flags over American schools, it won’t be long until Chinese armies will be raising their banner over all of the United States.

Isn’t the Texas lad that removed the Mexican flag in an illegal position of superiority over Old Glory just as much a patriot as Rosa Parks or Barbara Fritchie?

Barack Obama’s illegal alien aunt is to remain in America, likely as a welfare mooch. An immigration court has granted her asylum despite her refusal to comply with a 2004 deportation order. Like her more famous nephew, she has resided in public housing. Since she is disabled by Guillain-Barre syndrome it is unlikely she is unable to provide for herself and no doubt receives more government benefits than actual Americans who have been denied them despite paying into the system their entire working lives.

It has been hypothesized that a liberal is a conservative that hasn’t been mugged yet. Confirmation of the conjecture is now available in the form of a Supreme Court ruling that finds it violates constitutional provisions regarding cruel and unusual punishment to hand down a life sentence to a minor for offences other than homicide.

Obviously, the majority of the justices have not been victimized by out of control hellions. But then again, I guess there are not too many interested in running their fingers through Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s lingerie drawer.

Liberals only like blonds if they are quiet, pliant arm candy. Miss Oklahoma was booed when she gave the “incorrect” answer to a question as to what she thought of the Arizona immigration law. As a result, Miss Michigan won the pageant. The winner herself is an immigrant of Lebanese Islamic origins whose kin are no doubt proud she has achieved notoriety for acting like a Western harlot as she previously won accolades for her acumen with the stripper pole.

© Dr. Frederick Meekins

 

WesternFront America

Bare Naked Islam posted a video of  Attorney General Holder’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.  In this video, Eric Holder is being questioned by Rep. Lamar Smith R, Tx., who is trying to coax the A.G. into giving a straight answer to a crooked question. This dialog demands close attention, there is some cross talk involved.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOQt_mP6Pgg&feature=player_embedded

I have attempted to format Rep. Smith’s questions  in Century Gothic and A.G. Holder’s answers in Ariel.

In the case of all three attempts in the last year, the terrorist attempts, one of which was successful,  those individuals have had ties to radical Islam.  Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions that they did because of  radical Islam?

Because of? –Radical Islam.–There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions. Its hard–I think you have to look at each individual case. I mean we are in the process now of  talking to Mr. Shahzad to try to understand what it is that drove him to take the action he took.

But  radical Islam could have been one of the reasons ?

There are a variety of reasons–But was radical Islam one of  them? –  There are a variety of reasons why people do these things. Some of them are potentially religious convictions–But all I’m asking is if you think among those variety of reasons, radical Islam might have been one of the reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did?– We say radical Islam…I think those people who espouse a version of Islam that is not–Are you uncomfortable with attributing any of their actions to radical Islam it sounds like it?–No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriate–I’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion–Right and I’m saying  that a person like Anwar Awlaki,– for instance, who has a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings of of it and espouses a radical version–Could Radical Islam have motivated have motivated these individuals to take the steps that they did? –I certainly think that it is possible that people who espouse a radical version of Islam have had an ability to have an impact on people like Mr. Shahzad.–And could it have been the case in one of these three instances ?–Could that have been the case?–Yes–again, could one of these three individuals have been incited by radical Islam? Apparently you feel that they could have been.– I think potentially incited by a view of Islam that is inconsistent with–It is hard to get an answer   yes or no but let me go on to my next question, …

Rush Limbaugh & Sean  Hannity had fun with this video clip, playing the sound track for their audiences.  They drew attention to the fact that Holder carefully avoided attributing terror attacks to “radical Islam”.  Since I am an amateur, not dependent on advertisers for revenue, I can analyze the dialog more deeply than the professionals who are beholden to political correctness.

There are two critical statements in the dialog.

• “No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriate”
• “I’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion”

These politicians are trying to convey a false concept of Islam: that it is a religion with  ‘radical’ and ‘moderate’ forms.  Islam is a way of life, not a religion.  Its religious component is a social control mechanism which shields the aggressive way of life from recognition while it motivates Muslims to participate in genocidal conquest.  Their tactic has two objectives: first, to avoid being labeled  “racist” & “bigot”, second to avoid offending potential voters.

Some insightful person whose identity I have forgotten, said “Its Islam, Stupid.”.  Qualifiers such as ‘radical’ and catch phrases such as ‘Islamofascism’ distract us from objective factual reality which few are willing to acknowledge.

This hadith reveals too much about Islam, pay close attention to the parts I have emphasized.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will madisgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Jihad and agriculture are presented as alternative ways of life, agriculture is rejected in favor of jihad.  Jihad is their “original religion”.  That should give you a clue.

Don’t hand me the standard line of crap about jihad being a struggle against your ego. Moe waged war against anyone he could plunder, he did not struggle against temptation. After all, he married a six year old girl. He also married the wife of his adopted son  and seven other women besides captives and slaves he sexually exploited.  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims“.
One  Qur’an verse  conveys vital knowledge, affording you another clue.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

Fight in Allah’s cause, kill & be killed; its what Muslims do.  Got a clue yet?  The Qur’an mandates jihad, declaring that it is ordained for Muslims.  It also commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers. Surah Al-Anfal  39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until  resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped.  Surah At-Taubah 29 commands them to fight “people of the book”  until we are subjugated and submit to annual extortion demands. Moe confirmed those imperatives, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

Think back to the playing of the cockpit voice recorder after 9/11.  What did they say while they slit the  throats of the crew?  What did Nidal Malik Hasan  say when he opened fire at Fort Hood?  Why shout “All?hu Akbar”? Mohammad Atta has the  answer for you: “When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”  Allah is greatest just happens to be what they say when they slaughter a goat for eid and when slitting the throat of a captive.

What is the objective of striking fear?  It is done for the purpose of rendering us confused, agitated and unable to mount an effective defense; to make us easy prey.  It is commanded in Surah Al-Anfal 12 & 60.  It is exemplified in Surat Al-Ahzab 26 & Al-Hashr 2. It is celebrated in Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Terrorism is not exceptional.  Terrorism is not radical. Terrorism is not extreme; it is an intrinsic part of orthodox Islam.

Full documentation of the fatal facts outlined in this blog post is freely available.

• Islamic Terror.chm [30.4KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
• Jihad.chm [45KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
• What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm [23KB].
• Islamic Supremacism [49KB] A 3 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
• Islam’s Mercenary Mission 08/30/09 Full exposure of the dirty details of Islam’s foundational purpose: accrual of spoils & sex slaves. It is a war cult, not a ‘religion of peace’. This post is intended to serve as a reference link for bloggers & forum participants who expose Islam to the ignorant.  Post a link to it instead of re-inventing the wheel.
• FOMIJihad.chm [163.4KB] The Offensive Jihad thread from the old  FOMI anti Islam forum. This thread contains several significant quotes from Fiqh, both ancient and modern.
• What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims? 10/10/09 If nothing else, read this post and share it with all your family, friends & associates. This post contains the most vital information about Islam, fully documented and including common sense refutations of the most popular objections raised by bigoted multicultural idiots.  Copy this post, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence. Exhort the recipients to forward it.

Now is the time for the electorate to disrespectfully demand honesty from our  deceptive and cowardly politicians.  Tell them  that if they continue to lie to us, we will remember Nov. 2 ‘ 10.

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

…Tell Your Senators to Vote No!

“Barack Obama’s” Senate henchmen seek today or tomorrow to smuggle into law the racist, anti-Christian “Hate Crimes” bill that they hope will smooth the path for their hoped-for dictatorship. If we don’t fight them today, there might not be a tomorrow.

Since I never get involved in the nitty gritty of political activism, you know things have to be bad, if I’m doing so now. And they are bad. Today, Thursday, July 16, the Senate was scheduled to vote on the totalitarian “Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act (LLEHCPA),” aka the “Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” aka “S. 909.” The plan was to attach it to the Defense Authorization Bill, and sneak it through, but the attachment subterfuge, which was supposed to be done last night, at last report had not yet been carried out.

Imagine that. Smuggling the Hate Crimes Bill in through the Defense Authorization Bill. The Hate Crimes Bill that, by Attorney General Eric Holder’s admission in his June 26 Senate testimony, wouldn’t cover the vicious racially and religiously-motivated murder, allegedly by black Moslem convert Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, 23, of white soldier Pvt. William A. Long, 23, at a recruiting station in Little Rock.

The man calling himself “Barack Hussein Obama” and his senatorial henchmen seek to attach the bill to the Defense Authorization Bill, in order to exploit support of the military on behalf of a bill that would not protect white, presumably heterosexual military victims of racist and political hatred such as Pvt. Long and Sgt. Jan-Pawel Pietrzak, the newly wed white Marine, who with his black bride was tortured and slaughtered, allegedly by a racist black gang, but not before she was gang-raped, because Sgt. and Mrs. Pietrzak had had the temerity to fall in love across racial lines.

But then, though a racist like Eric Holder will never admit it, increasing numbers of blacks have been waging race war on whites since at least 1963, with ever more grisly rape-torture-murders being routinely committed, and with ever growing support from respectable black folks.

I’m not condemning the Hate Crimes Bill because I want a hate crimes law that will protect whites, though I do demand of any Hate Crimes Law that is enacted that it be applied to crimes committed by blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals, women, etc., against heterosexual white men and women, but because all such laws are unconstitutional, racist, and all the other “ists.”

Like so-called civil rights laws, so-called Hate Crimes laws are part of America’s growing system of Shadow Law, which forces most white Americans to live in the shadows, without legal protection, while racist blacks, Hispanics, illegal aliens, heterophobic homosexuals, etc., enjoy unconstitutional and illegal privileges. Shadow Law is no longer limited to laws with special modifiers (“Civil Rights”, “Hate Crime,” etc.), but have come to dominate all criminal and civil law, as those who belong to “non-protected classes” (a status which changes, based on the offender’s political identity) have been disenfranchised vis-à-vis members of “protected classes,” an unconstitutional designation, which nevertheless is routinely used by police and prosecutors. Note that the vast majority of crimes in America are committed by members of the “protected classes,” while the “non-protected” classes are comprised of America’s most law-abiding citizens. Such racist shenanigans give new meaning to the phrase, “No good deed goes unpunished”!

“Barack Obama” knows that a substantial majority of the American people would not support S. 909, if they knew about its character. That is why he had Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy (Racial Socialist-Maine) limit Senate hearings to two hours of dissimulation and sophistry by racist Attorney General Eric Holder, and has ordered his MSM henchmen to tell the American people as little as possible about the bill.

As powerful as “Obama” is, however, despite the 60 vote Senate supermajority that ACORN succeeded at providing him, through stealing a Minnesota U.S. Senate seat for Al Franken, after Norm Coleman had beaten Franken in the actual election, he seeks much more power. S. 909 is designed to give it to him. (Not that that will satisfy this aspiring totalitarian dictator; nothing will.)

In a nutshell, S. 909 would, if passed and enacted (and “Obama” will certainly sign it, if it passes the Senate), disenfranchise white, heterosexual, politically right-of-center men, while giving even more privileges to blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals and illegal aliens, the latter of whom, according to American law, have no rights. It would also pioneer new frontiers in the unconstitutional violation of double jeopardy. Not only would the hate crimes law “permit” the feds to re-prosecute whites who had been acquitted in state court, it would “permit” the feds to re-prosecute whites who had been convicted in state court, but whom political leaders felt had been insufficiently punished!

While Eric Holder claimed the law would protect Jews, this is one Jew who has been repeatedly racially assaulted by blacks in New York, yet who has always been treated like a criminal by Manhattan DA Robert Morgenthau’s office. The only Jews who will benefit from S. 909 are racists like Morgenthau, who are already so wealthy and powerful, that privilege is second nature to them, and who have for generations done everything in their substantial powers to harm poor, working, and middle-class Jews. (Bernard Goetz, the man who defended himself against a mugging attempt in broad daylight in front of multiple witnesses by four violent, young, black career criminals, and against whom Morgenthau then directed an obsessive, years-long, persecution campaign, is a Jew.) The notion that “Jews” will benefit, as Jews, from S. 909 is a myth.

For the most comprehensive criticisms of S. 909, I suggest reading my VDARE article, “What the Heretical 2 Case Says about the Federal ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill.”

For the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ (USCCR) criticisms of S. 909, which the New York Times and the rest of the MSM have vigorously censored, see my VDARE article, “New York Times Finds Civil Rights Commission’s Condemnation of Hate Bill (and AG Holder’s Jim Snow Policies) Unfit to Print.”

Minutes ago, my VDARE colleague Patrick Cleburne blogged that the Christian Family Research Council has just put together a powerful video update opposing the Bill, which they rightfully argue (as have I), is designed to intimidate Christians out of preaching the Christian Gospel. (That is but one of the bill’s nefarious purposes.)

We don’t know when the Senate’s Democratic leadership will try and sneak through the Hate Crimes Bill—perhaps Thursday, perhaps Friday—so my advice to you is to e-mail your senators now, call the Senate switchboard, denouncing the Bill, and call your U.S. senators, demanding that they vote against it.

U.S. Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121.

Telephone number and e-mail address for each individual U.S. senator: here. A tip ‘o the hat tocausa nostrae laetitiae.

A tip ‘o the hat tocausa nostrae laetitiae.

© Nicholas Stix

 

WesternFront America