Pastor Terry Jones did the nation a service by bringing  a burning issue to the front burner and let it down by failing to fully exploit the issue.  He should have explained in detail why the Qur’an should be burned and  and exhorted people to read it.  He should especially have exhorted preachers to read the most egregious  ayat from their lecterns to educate their congregations.

Jones did another great disservice to the nation and the free world by backing down in the face of Islamic threats and governmental condemnation.  Backing down to threats reinforces those who make the threats.  When we back down, the bullys experience triumph and are encouraged by it to  issue more threats in the future.

There was no need to burn hundreds of Qur’ans and no benefit from it.  Burning one is sufficient for the symbolic act of resistance to Islamic intimidation, infiltration, sedition and conquest.

Had he burned just one English translation of the Qur’an,  he could have answered the hordes of Muslim protesters with a simple statement that he did not burn their sacred book; Muslims do not consider translations to be  sacred.

Another Christian activist and  associates gathered near the White House to protest  Islamic violence.  They  crumpled pages torn from a paperback translation of the Qur’an.  The torn pages were selected for their violent, anti-Christian content.  Think Progress reports that Andrew Beacham did the tearing while Randall Terry explained which  verses were selected and why.  In a radio interview with Sean Hannity, Terry urged listeners to read the Qur’an.  Hannity agreed and announced that he would have a special Qur’an reading hour this week,  possibly as soon as Tuesday September 14.

Randall Terry also gave  the url of his blog, which contains two papers he wrote for one of his courses in a Masters degree program. I did not catch it off the air, but hope I found it with a Google search.  A press release revealed that two papers were distributed at the protest.  Earth Times published a list of the torn ayat.  9:5-6 are listed, 9:29, 30, 33 & 123 are interesting omissions.

1) “Is Islamic Sharia law incompatible with international laws of human rights for freedom of thought, conscience, religion and expression?”

2) “How do the words and deeds of Islamic terrorists, or Muslims who call for acts of terror and violence, emulate the words and deeds of Muhammad?”

There is one thing more important than incinerating a Qur’an: becoming familiar with  its evil content.   Noel Yatom published a list of 164 violent verses. The Calcutta Qur’an Petition lists some critical ayat which establish the doctrine of jihad: offensive conquest.

During his early days in Medina, the Prophet apprehended attacks from the Quraish of Meeca.  So he formed the Muslim-Jewish alliance as a defensive measure.  Allah came forward with “revelations” (22.39-41) permitting the Prophet to fight in self-defence, and promising help.  But no attacks came from Mecca so that the Prophet was left free to break his alliance with the Jews and form his own Muslim Ummah.  Allah obliged immediately by converting the permission into a command (2.216; 4.76-77, 84, 8.39, 66- 66).  War against the Pagans now became obligatory on all Muslims.  Muslims were to go out and attack the infidels in regular military formations (4.71; 8.15; 9.123; 61.4). …Allah had purchased the lives and properties of the Muslims in exchange for dominion in this word and paradise hereafter (2.244-45; 9.111).  Avoiding jihAd became a great sin and violation of the covenant with Allah (2.218; 3.156; 4.74, 77, 95; 9.24, 38-39, 81.84). Becoming a martyr (shahId) became the highest merit for every Muslim (2.154; 3.157, 169-70,195, 198; 22.58; 33.16-17).

Click those links, print the verses, take them to Sunday school, and ask the teacher to identify them, “what part of the Bible is this from”.  Change Allah to God, and you’ll have them stumped.  If that does not get you shunned or disfellowshiped,  spring them on the preacher; ask him to read them in church.

It is not necessary to read the entire Qur’an to discover its true nature nor is there any mystery about it. Allah’s commands are contained in clear verses which are the foundation of the book.  If you read Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah, you will have a pretty good understanding of the bottom line.

The hierarchy of your church probably believes the standard lies, that Islam is a “great religion of peace” and an “equally valid pathway to God”.  They probably believe that Islam reveres Jesus as a Prophet, too.  Of course they don’t know that Islam denies his paternity, divinity, crucifixion, death & resurrection, depicts him as inferior to Muhammad and a genocidal warlord who will “kill the Jews” when he returns.   What if you prove it to them?  My blog post “The Defamation of Jesus Christ“, contains the evidence you need, from the Qur’an, hadith & Tafsir, to show  your church the anti-Christian core of Islam.  Will you do it?  If you won’t. who will?

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

President Barack Hussein Obama never tires of repeating the same al-Taqiyya; I tire of  refuting  his lies, but I will continue because I view  truth as a sacred value which must be preserved in order to preserve liberty.  As usual, I will take the worst lies out of context and refute them.  Those desiring the whole sack of feces can choose between the video:  Press Conference Video and the transcript.

“As I said in Cleveland on Wednesday, I ran for President because I believed the policies of the previous decade had left our economy weaker and our middle class struggling.  They were policies that cut taxes, especially for millionaires and billionaires, cut regulations for corporations and for special interests, and left everyone else pretty much fending for themselves.  They were policies that ultimately culminated in a financial crisis and a terrible recession that we’re still digging out of today. ”

The policies that weakened our economy  belong to the LibTards in Congress and the White House, both Democrat and Republican.  There is no free lunch and no magic wand.  Due to the intentional destruction of  our system of education, the general public lacks the knowledge of economics necessary to anticipate the stream of lies coming from hucksters & politicians.  They did not learn from the .com bubble, so they bought into the housing bubble and got stung again.

This story has three morals:

1. Get politicians & union goons out of the education system.
2. Caveat Emptor!!!
3. Never vote for a LibTard!!!

It is not possible to spur economic growth by wasting vast sums on boodoggles and increasing the national debt.  It is necessary to get more money into the hands of consumers and increase their confidence in the economy.  Everything Obama proposes is counterproductive.

“And finally, tomorrow we will commemorate not only the heartbreak of September 11th, but also the enduring values and resilient spirit of America.  Both Michelle and I will be joining our fellow citizens in remembering those who were lost on that day and honoring all who exhibited such extraordinary heroism in the midst of tragedy.  I’ll have further remarks tomorrow, but for now let me just note that tomorrow is a National Day of Service and Remembrance and I hope each of us finds a way to serve our fellow citizens — not only to reaffirm our deepest values as Americans, but to rekindle that spirit of unity and common purpose that we felt in the days that followed that September morning.”

heartbreak of September 11th

This demagogue can enrage me without  making an effort. Expressions like that make my blood boil.  Evil men, motivated by  the evil doctrines of an evil institution committed an evil act designed to destroy our economic strength and crush our will to resist.  There are empty chairs at three thousand dinner tables because of that act.

enduring values of America

Those words are polluted by passage through the lips of demagogues who  have no respect for our God given rights to life, liberty, property; freedom of speech,  religion, assembly & petition.   Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. It has a religious component which serves to motivate its murderers and camouflage their mercenary mission.  It is  180° out of phase with each and every one of those American values to which the demagogue alluded.  None of those are applicable to it.

National Day of Service and Remembrance

Shanghai us into slavery in the guise of  honoring the dead. Christ save me, how I hate that liar!!!  A day of cursing Islam and renewing our resolve to destroy it completely.

deepest values as Americans

Those alluded to above, which are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution which Obama hates and violates.  Abomination!!!

spirit of unity and common purpose

Unity in cursing the evil institution which inspired the murderous act of war which killed three thousand and did billions of dollars of economic damage.  Unity in seeking national security; in the urge to prevent further attacks.  Unity destroyed by carping demagogues and their willing accomplices in the media. Common purpose wasted by a weak President who could not bring himself to name and declare war against the enemy.

“I think that at a time when the country is anxious generally and going through a tough time, then fears can surface, suspicions, divisions can surface in a society. And so I think that plays a role in it.”

suspicions, divisions can surface

Translation: “Islamophobic bigots are blaming Muslims for every evil on the face of the earth–scapegoating them as Hitler scapegoated  Jews.”  No rational person is blaming our economic situation on Muslims or their war cult.  They own the blame. for the accursed abomination of nine years ago and subsequent attacks both failed and successful.

“One of the things that I most admired about President Bush was after 9/11, him being crystal-clear about the fact that we were not at war with Islam. ”

not at war with Islam

Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines of Islam, which promise them forgiveness of sins and eternal carnality in Allah’s celestial bordello, attacked us in the name of Allah, as they are commanded to do by that demon.  They shouted “Allahu Akhbar!” while slitting the throats of the flight crews. Islam declared and prosecuted war against us  So, why the Hell are we not at war against it?

Deniers are damned fools, Shrub included.  More than two hundred years ago, the Barbary  Pirates sacked our shipping and nearly bankrupted the new nation with demands for tribute.  When asked by what right they attacked us, they gave a very enlightening answer.

“The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.” [Wikipedia]

• founded on the laws of the Prophet
• written in their Koran
• those not submissive are sinners
• right and duty to make war on them
  • enslave them
• martyrs  going to heaven

Is there some part of the Muslim’s answer to Adams & Jefferson that you  can not comprehend?   What part of it escapes Obama’s comprehension??  When caliph Umar sent his army to Persia, the Persian general asked a  question similar to Jefferson’s and received a similar answer.  This crucial quote comes from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

• Prophet ordered us to fight you
• martyrs go to Paradise
• survivors will be your master

Can you see the parallels?  Can you connect the dots?  Why can’t  Shrub & Obama???  They can but they won’t, because Shrub was not comfortable with the fact that he had two  options: to kill 1.3 billion people or break their faith so that they would no longer be Muslims obligated to wage war against us.   Obama won’t because he is one of them.  His father was Muslim; Islam passes through patriarchy. A Muslim’s children are Muslims, by Islamic law.  If Obama had a genuine conversion, he would condemn Islam because he knows its evil from the inside.

“We were at war with terrorists and murderers who had perverted Islam, had stolen its banner to carry out their outrageous acts.”

terrorists and murderers

Read “Muslims”. Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. “I will cast terror“, “so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes“, “to strike a terror“, “Allah cast terror“,  “I have been made victorious with terror“.  How do you refute the Islamic record of what Allah & Moe said and did?

perverted Islam

In  the previous paragraph, I gave you quotes from the Qur’an & hadith.  Allah said that he would and did “cast terror”.   Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.  What part of that do you not comprehend?  I gave you links; click them and read multiple translations of the Qur’an and one translation of Sahih Bukhari.

`Who perverted Islam?  Allah said something about war. I will quote one of those statements, an  imperative commanding Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.  This quote is from J.M. Rodwell’s translation, linked to multiple translations.

9:29. Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

What did Allah command Muslims to do?  Most of the translators  give it as fight.  What does it mean?  Moe told his companions what it meant to him, who is more expert in interpreting his revelations?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”  [Emphasis added.]

That Islamic scripture & oral tradition are codified in Shari’ah; Islamic law.  I quote from Reliance  of the Traveller, the handbook of Shafi’ite Fiqh.

o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29), [Emphasis & link added.]

• Make war upon…
• ordered to fight
• caliph makes war

What did Al-Mughira  say to the Persian general?  What did Sidi Haji Abdrahaman say to Adams & Jefferson?  Then on what quicksand does Obama stand while asserting that Islam has been “perverted”?  Moe set the standard of Islam with his recitation and actions.  Islamic law, founded on that recitation & sunnah, obligates Muslims to wage war against disbelievers, aggressive, offensive warfare on Islamic initiative at least one attack per year.  President Obama is a liar and a traitor.  I direct doubters & dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller, Book o9.0 through 9.9. Clueless morons who  believe that those imperatives are anachronistic or metaphorical are directed to the following resources for correction.  The last listed item  will disabuse you of the delusion that Moe only fought defensive battles.

• Sahih Bukhari 4.52 Jihad
• Sahih Bukhari 4.53 Khumus
• Sahih Bukhari 5.59  Expedition
• Sahih Muslim  Jihad
• Sunan Abu Dawud Jihad
• Malik’s Muwatta Jihad
• Extortion letter to the Rulers of Aqaba

“And I was so proud of the country rallying around that idea, that notion that we are not going to be divided by religion; we’re not going to be divided by ethnicity.  We are all Americans.  We stand together against those who would try to do us harm. ”

not going to be divided

by religion

by ethnicity

How can  anyone hear or read those words without cursing?  Obama and his party have made a career of racial & ethnic division as well as economic class warfare which is exemplified early in his press conference. He demands that a Mosque be erected on Ground Zero but says nothing about a Greek Orthodox Church that has been frustrated by bureaucrats for nine years.  America ain’t hyphenated.

“And I think it is absolutely important now for the overwhelming majority of the American people to hang on to that thing that is best in us, a belief in religious tolerance, clarity about who our enemies are — our enemies are al Qaeda and their allies who are trying to kill us, but have killed more Muslims than just about anybody on Earth. ”

religious tolerance

First, Islam is a predatory way of life, not a religion. It preys upon the human race.  It declared and is prosecuting war against pagan and scriptural disbelievers.

Second, tolerance must be reciprocal; Islam is intolerant.  Islam does not tolerate any religion, it only tolerates Islam. Get a clue.

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

Islam curses us.

9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

When Islam triumphs over Christians, it imposes draconian legal and social restrictions on them.  This quote from Reliance of the Traveller informs us that Christians can not give testimony in trials. Only Muslims can testify!

o24.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a witness
who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:
c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child
or insane person, even when the child’s testimony
regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at
play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
“Let those of rectitude among you testify”
(Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as
goes without saying); [Emphasis added.]

o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to
comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety
and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In
addition, they:
(1) are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, though not for drunkenness;
(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunna:r);
(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu
‘alaykum” ;
(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as
the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a
tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or
pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public
display of their funerals and feastdays;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches.
011.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz,
meaning the area and towns around Mecca,
Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days
(when the caliph allows them to enter there for
something they need).[Emphasis added.]

Exactly why in Hell should we tolerate a war cult which curses us,  denies the sanctity of our blood and property, denies our rights; declares & prosecutes war upon us!??

clarity about who our enemies are

What book contains a clear command to wage war upon us?  Whose book is that?  Then who the Hell is our enemy!??  “Its Islam, stupid!”  Who prays for our defeat? Who burns our flag? Who marches in the streets chanting “Death to America!”?  Who carries signs declaring “Freedom go to Hell!”??

The fact that Islam is divided into schismatic sects who hate each other’s existence does not make any of them our friends or allies. They have one thing in common: hatred of disbelievers.

“And I will do everything that I can as long as I am President of the United States to remind the American people that we are one nation under God, and we may call that God different names but we remain one nation.”

call that God different names

There is one God, aid he ain’t Allah!  Allah is an ancient deity of  pagan Arabia, previously going under different names including Baal and Sin. Read the Qur’an and see if it reflects the God you worship.

“But I’m also respectful that people of different faiths can practice their religion, even if they don’t subscribe to the exact same notions that I do, and that they are still good people, and they are my neighbors and they are my friends, and they are fighting alongside us in our battles.”

practice their religion

Does the practice of religion include obedience to religious obligations?  Are you aware of the fard al-kifaya of Jihad?  It binds all free, able bodied & sane adult male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front. I refer doubters & dissenters to Reliance o9.1.  Muslims can not practice Islam without waging war on us. Its what they do; what Allah purchased them for.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success . [Emphasis added.]

When disbelievers retaliate and invade Muslim lands, the obligation becomes  fard ayn, binding upon all Muslims. If they are overrun, that includes women and children and Muslims wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth.

Muslims are obligated to obey Allah and  his Messenger. What did Allah command them to do?  What did Moe do for them to emulate?  In the last nine years of his life he started a war every six weeks on the average.   Get a clue.

they are my friends

If they are good, obedient Muslims, they are not your friends. Allah expressly forbids friendship & partnership with disbelievers, even if they are parents  & siblings.

3:118. O you who believe! Take not as (your) Bitânah (advisors, consultants, protectors, helpers, friends, etc.) those outside your religion (pagans, Jews, Christians, and hypocrites) since they will not fail to do their best to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already appeared from their mouths, but what their breasts conceal is far worse. Indeed We have made plain to you the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses) if you understand.
9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.).

“President Abbas and Prime Minister Netanyahu were here last week, and they came with a sense of purpose and seriousness and cordiality that, frankly, exceeded a lot of people’s expectations.  What they said was that they were serious about negotiating.”

serious about negotiating

There is no limit to treachery & irrationality. There is no peace between Muslims and Jews, never was and never will be.  I have a few clues for you in addition to 9:29, previously cited.

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

Who might Allah send to torment the Jews?  Any nominees?

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.
Sunan Abu Dawud Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.
Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews. [Emphasis added.]

The Roman Province of Syria was conquered by caliph Umar in 638, driving out many Jews and Christians. In 1948, the jews recovered a tiny fragment of their stolen patrimony. Muslims can’t tolerate that because land once conquered must forever remain  in Muslim hands, it belongs to Allah.  Allah promised them a two to one kill ratio and victory.  Israel’s successful self-defense proves Allah to be an impotent idol. That is the ultimate blasphemy which Muslims will never accept.  There will be peace when there are no more Muslims, not until then, no matter what suicidal concessions you force Israel to make.

“The idea that we would burn the sacred texts of someone else’s religion is contrary to what this country stands for.  It’s contrary to what this country — this nation was founded on.  And my hope is, is that this individual prays on it and refrains from doing it.”

we would burn

The planned Qur’an burning is a private affair, belonging to the church involved, not to the nation as a whole or the government.

contrary to what this nation’s foundation

This nation was founded on Judeo-Christian ideals, not Muslim ideals.  The founders declared that we are free to choose what, when & how to worship or not.  Islam declares that only Allah has the right to be worshiped and that war must be waged to secure that right.  The Qur’an contains the conquest imperatives behind the accursed abomination perpetrated nine years ago today.   This nation was also founded on the ideal of free expression.  Pastor Jones has a right to express his indignation at Islam’s demon worship & genocidal conquest.

“But I’m also Commander-in-Chief, and we are seeing today riots in Kabul, riots in Afghanistan, that threaten our young men and women in uniform.  And so we’ve got an obligation to send a very clear message that this kind of behavior or threats of action put our young men and women in harm’s way.  And it’s also the best imaginable recruiting tool for al Qaeda.”

this kind of behavior

Our very existence offends Muslims.  Nothing Pastor Jones can do will offend them more than the presence of our troops in Afghanistan.  They need no further  pretext for hating and attacking us.  We can not exacerbate their hatred by any  act or omission.

Backing down and suspending or canceling the protest as Pastor Jones has done is the worst possible error.  It gives Islam a victory, proof that terror and the threat thereof is effective.  It will  enhance terrorist recruitment and funding.

My blog posts enrage them. One of my blogs has been banned by Pakistan. What is to stop you from demanding  that my free expression of  relevant, verifiable  factual information be censored?  By God I stand on the  free speech clause of the First Amendment!!

Our national security is not endangered by  those of us who expose & condemn Islam, it is endangered by traitors like you who appease Muslims and fail to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth.

“Well, I think it needs to happen.  And we’re going to work with members of Congress — and this is going to have to be on a bipartisan basis — to move this forward in a way that is consistent with our standards of due process, consistent with our Constitution, consistent also with our image in the world of a country that cares about rule of law.  You can’t underestimate the impact of that.

Al Qaeda operatives still cite Guantanamo as a justification for attacks against the United States. Still to this day.  And there’s no reason for us to give them that kind of talking point when, in fact, we can use the various mechanisms of our justice system to prosecute these folks and to make sure that they never attack us again.”

consistent also with our image

Image be damned! Its the reality that is important, not any image, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  Khalid Sheikh Mouammad and his colleagues signed a confession in which they took pride in what they did, based on Allah’s accursed imperatives and Moe’s damned example.  They need  trials like you need a toothache.

Holding prisoners is the greatest possible incentive for fresh attacks because the enemy seeks hostages for exchange.  Just usher them into Hell immediately and be done with them!!!

Those are unlawful enemy combatants, not purse snatchers.  They do not deserve the privileges & immunities of citizens charged with petty offenses. F.D.R. set a good precedent, follow it.

“Here’s what I think.  I think that in this day and age, there are going to be — there is always going to be the potential for an individual or a small group of individuals, if they are willing to die, to kill other people.  Some of them are going to be very well organized and some of them are going to be random.  That threat is there.  And it’s important, I think, for the American people to understand that, and not to live in fear.  It’s just a reality of today’s world that there are going to be threats out there.”

willing to die, to kill other people

Being killed in battle  against disbelievers is the only guaranteed ticket to the best levels of  the celestial bordello.  It is also the only certified get out of Hell free card.  If they are fully informed and really believe, they will seek martyrdom.

not to live in fear

After the accursed abomination there was anxiety over follow up attacks.  During the D.C. Sniper episode, there was great anxiety and a few copy cat attacks.  Those attacks are calculated to tear our social fabric, to induce paranoia and make normal  life impossible.   Ultimately, terrorism is intended to render its victims incapable of mounting   an effective defense effort.

There is one and only one solution to this problem:  remove the Islamic fifth column from our  soil and keep them out.  Deport Muslims and ban them from entering.  If we won’t do that, we won’t have security.

“We are tougher than them.  Our families and our businesses and our churches and mosques and synagogues and our Constitution, our values, that’s what gives us strength.  And we are going to have this problem out there for a long time to come.  But it doesn’t have to completely distort us. And it doesn’t have to dominate our foreign policy.  What we can do is to constantly fight against it.  And I think ultimately, we are going to be able to stamp it out.  But it’s going to take some time.”

churches and mosques

The two do not belong in one sentence. Mosques are places where Muslims congregate to curse us and pray for our defeat. Seventeen times each day they remind Allah of why he wants to burn us; how  we went astray or earned his  wrath.  Mosques are their armories. Recently, fifteen Muslims died in a Mosque in Afghanistan when their bomb detonated prematurely.

Religious faith is part of our strength.  According to S.K. Malik’s Qur’anic Concept of War,  destroying faith is a necessary prerequisite to instilling terror.

“With respect to the mosque in New York, I think I’ve been pretty clear on my position here, and that is, is that this country stands for the proposition that all men and women are created equal; that they have certain inalienable rights — one of those inalienable rights is to practice their religion freely. And what that means is that if you could build a church on a site, you could build a synagogue on a site, if you could build a Hindu temple on a site, then you should be able to build a mosque on the site.”

all men and women are created equal

Islamic law says that we can not build churches or maintain existing churches.  Islamic law says that we can not testify in court.  Islamic law says that the testimony of one man is equal to that of two women.

build a mosque on the site

The St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church stood across the street from the towers. It was crushed when they collapsed.  The bureaucrats of the Port Authority have given them the run around for nine years, they celebrated Christmas in a tent.  But the Mosque is on the fast track.

practice their religion freely

The practice of Islam involves waging war on disbelievers.  President Obama said that  Muslims have a right to practice Islam. President Obama is a traitor because he postulates a right to wage war against us. Democrats, ignoramuses and damned fools will deny this. Let them; facts trump emotions..

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

“And fortunately, the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world are peace-loving, are interested in the same things that you and I are interested in:  How do I make sure I can get a good job?  How can I make sure that my kids get a decent education?  How can I make sure I’m safe?  How can I improve my lot in life?  And so they have rejected this violent ideology for the most part — overwhelmingly.”.

peace-loving Muslims

Hypocrites, not Muslims if they love peace; their Islam goes no deeper than their throats.

interested in

They are interested in pleasing Allah, staying out of Hell and getting into  the celestial bordello. Believers sold their souls so that they fight in Allah’s cause, “kill others and are killed”.

improve my lot in life

In Psychology class, we were taught that all humans share  a common hierarchy of needs. Tell that to Allah.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
6:32. And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
6:70. And leave alone those who take their religion as play and amusement, and are deceived by the life of this world. But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are given up to destruction because of that which they have earned. For them will be a drink of boiling water and a painful torment because they used to disbelieve.
4:74. Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward. [Emphasis added.]

“The other reason it’s important for us to remember that is because we’ve got millions of Muslim Americans, our fellow citizens, in this country.  They’re going to school with our kids.  They’re our neighbors.  They’re our friends.  They’re our coworkers.  And when we start acting as if their religion is somehow offensive, what are we saying to them? ”

their religion is somehow offensive

What? Declaring unending warfare against the rest of the human race is not offensive?  Declaring women to be half as intelligent and half as valuable as a man is not offensive? Declaring a right to enslave and rape non-Muslim women is not offensive?  Declaring a right to enslave non-Muslim   children is is not offensive?
Sanctifying terrorism & genocide is not offensive?  Co-opting Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord is not offensive?

“I’ve got Muslims who are fighting in Afghanistan in the uniform of the United States armed services. They’re out there putting their lives on the line for us.  And we’ve got to make sure that we are crystal-clear for our sakes and their sakes they are Americans and we honor their service.  And part of honoring their service is making sure that they understand that we don’t differentiate between them and us.  It’s just us. ”

Have you so soon forgotten what Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan did?  How can anyone be sure that those enlisted Muslims are loyal,  not just biding their time for the maximum  return on their investment?

 

WesternFront America

Alec Rawls  sent out another blogburst on the Flight 93 memorial issue. The Crescent of Embrace is, effectively, the first 9/11 Victory Mosque, Park 51 is the second.

A group of motorcyclists will be riding to Somerset to protest. Alec is urging others within riding distance to join them on the ninth anniversary of the accursed abomination.  This will be your best opportunity to demonstrate opposition to the Victory Mosque with extensive media coverage.

The blogburst includes four embedded videos. In some venues, they may not work, so I have included links to YouTube.

Flight 93 on 9/11: Ride to Stop the Crescent Mosque

Anyone live within driving distance of Somerset Pennsylvania? It’s a beautiful place to visit and a group of motorcyclists from Indianapolis is already going. Tom Burnett Senior and Alec Rawls are buying full page color ads in the Somerset Daily American for both Friday the 10th and Saturday the 11th, so anyone who makes the trip will have a ready made protest sign waiting for them. Just buy a newspaper, tape the ad to a piece of cardboard, and let the massed national media know what side you are on. That’s right. With Barbara Bush and Michelle Obama both attending, it’s going to be a media circus, and a rare opportunity to force coverage of our issue. Just self-organize. Ad-holders will show a core of united opposition (and the media might even be forced to read our brief expose). A PDF of the ad will be posted in another blogburst next week for anyone who wants to make signs ahead of time. There is also a set of small posters that were put together for a previous talk by Mr. Burnett. Just print with tiling to make the finished product as large or small as you want:

Board 1: The giant crescent Board 2: It points to Mecca Board 3: The gigantic Islamic sundial Board 4: The 44 glass blocks

Petition to stop the Flight 93 memorial passes 10,000 signatures Including a spate of dozen or so by 9/11 family members that feature some very strong comments. (See pages 198 and 199.)

It Points to Mecca video nearing 20,000 hits Thanks to big fat repostings by Creeping Sharia and Atlas Shrugs. Thank You!

It points to Mecca

Click here to watch on YouTube if embedding does not work.
Here are parts 2, 3 and 4 (also worthy):

44 inscribed translucent memorial blocks on the flight path

Click here to watch on YouTube if embedding does not work.

1 in 131 billion: Repeated Mecca orientations in the Flight 93 memorial prove intent

Click here to watch on YouTube if embedding does not work.

Shameless coverup: The Flight 93 mosque, Part 4

Click here to watch on YouTube if embedding does not work.

If you haven’t been to Shanksville before, there really is no lovelier place on earth than an open field in that sprawling Sherwood Forest that is Western Pennsylvania. Drink it in. There is something in the air at that patriots’ grave. To join our blogburst against the crescent mosque, just send your blog’s url.

[The blogroll script is not compatible with this venue. If you want to see it, Google the title, you will find it on one of my other blogs or elsewhere in the blogburst.]

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

When ABC Radio News came on, they broadcast a sound byte which sent me on an urgent mission to the bathroom. The sound byte was from Mayor Bloomberg’s Iftar.  I found Bloomberg’s  prepared remarks at The Page.  I am not going to reproduce Mark Halperin’s article here,  I will quote the most  egregious excrement out of context & out of sequence; if you want to read it all in context, use the link above.

Here is the sound bite that pissed me off.

“Islam did not attack the World Trade Center – Al-Qaeda did. To implicate all of Islam for the actions of a few who twisted a great religion is unfair and un-American. Today we are not at war with Islam – we are at war with Al-Qaeda and other extremists who hate freedom.”

Islam did not attack

When the hijackers slit the throats of the flight crews, they pronounced the takbir, praising the demon whose name is Allah.  Allahhu Akhbar means “Allah is greater.”. They murdered the flight crews in Allah’s name, that makes it an Islamic act.

Al-Qaeda did

Al-Qaeda is only a name, an artificial subdivision of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood is only a name, an artificial subdivision of  Ummah al-Islamiyya.  I refer damned fools, liars, doubters, deniers & dissenters to the Charter of HAMAS, which defines the Falestinian branch of  al-Ikhwan-al-Muslimeen.

• Article One:

  The Islamic Resistance Movement: The Movement’s programme is Islam. From it, it draws its ideas, ways of thinking and understanding of the universe, life and man. It resorts to it for judgement in all its conduct, and it is inspired by it for guidance of its steps.

• Article Eight:

  Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its  wishes. [Emphasis & link added.]

Who is the Brotherhood’s target?  Who is its model? What is its constitution?  What is its highest aspiration?  How in Hell does that differ from Islam! Al-Ikhwan-al-Muslimeen, HAMAS & al-Qaeda are Islam, nothing more, nothing less.  Their ideology is Islam’s ideology.

implicate all of Islam

What the Hell did they say?  In whose name did they slit throats?    What did he command them to do?

• 9:5. … then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush….
• 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Allah commanded Muslims to  wage war against us until we are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. What did Moe say?

• Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
  Narrated Anas bin Malik:
  Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.” [Emphasis added.]

Why did Moe say that he was ordered to fight the people?  Who gave him that order?   What is the practical application of that order? How is it implemented?

• …Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand…. [The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah]
• 09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others…
  • …If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims. The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year…. [Emphasis added.]
  • “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”
• o9.8 Thc caliph (025) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,
  and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim  poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (0: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the  non-Muslim poll tax (0: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High, “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax  out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9:29),…

Why is neglecting jihad sinful?  Why is jihad required in every year?  Why  did Al-Shafi’i rule that jihad must be performed annually, if possible?

actions of a few

Jihad is fard al-kifaya; communally binding until a sufficient number have responded to the front. (Undat al-Salik o9.1)  Full mobilization is only required (fard ayn) when Dar ul-Islam is invaded.  Those few are the believers [8:2, 49:15 ] who have been purchased by Allah as slaves to fight in his cause, kill and be killed.

twisted a great religion

I showed you Allah’s imperative, Moe’s confirmation, and their codification in Shari’ah.  What was twisted?  It is Islam, stupid; it ain’t Judaism and it ain’t Christianity. It ain’t al-Qaeda. It is Islam, stupid!

we are not at war with Islam

True, Islam is at war against us, but  our elected leadership is too stupid, dishonest, cowardly & treasonous to acknowledge the fact and reciprocate.

at war with Al-Qaeda

Shrub declared “war on terror”, which is a tactic of Islam, not an enemy.

and other extremists

The founder of Islam revealed the Jihad imperatives.  The founder of Islam exemplified compliance with them and bragged that he was “made victorious with terror”.  Moe is the standard.  What Moe preached and practiced is normative Islam, not extremism!

who hate freedom

They hate kufr: rebellion against Allah (disbelief).  They hate everything not Islamic.

“But if we say that a mosque and community center should not be built near the perimeter of the World Trade Center site, we would compromise our commitment to fighting terror with freedom.”

The Burlington Coat factory took a direct hit; part of one aircraft projected through the tower and penetrated the roof,  passing through two floors.   That makes it part of ground zero.

Terror is not an enemy, it is a tactic.  Islam is fighting us and we need to fight Islam.  Freedom is our highest value, not a tactic, neither is it a weapon.  If we desire to remain alive and free, then we must retaliate and eliminate the enemy which attacked us in the 19^th century and resumed attacking us in the 20^th .

Freedom must be reciprocal.  Islam does not reciprocate, it enslaves.  We  are not obligated to give our enemy a staging ground and weapons from which and with which to attack us.

“First, that Muslims have a constitutional right to build a mosque in Lower Manhattan…”

“…And above all of that, we are Americans, each with an equal right to worship and pray where we choose….”

The First Amendment’s free exercise clause is meant to protect legitimate religions, not war cults.  Islam sanctifies conquest, genocide & terrorism.  How in Hell can there be a right to perform genocidal conquest, which is a “religious obligation” in Islam?  If there is a right to practice Islam, then Muslims have  a right to kill us, rape our widows and enslave our orphans. If such rights exist, our rights are abrogated.

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

The Examiner  published an article by Armir Taraj entitled:  Park51 Opponents Linked to Admirer of Terror Group Founder.   The article presented ad hominem arguments against Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer and appealed to biased authority figures without presenting  relevant, verifiable facts to refute the arguments presented by Geller and Spencer.

Presuming that their comment system would not allow links, I responded with references to Islam’s canon.

Liberals resort to argumentum ad hominem because they have no relevant, verifiable facts with which to defend their emotion based positions .

The fact is that Islam is intrinsically evil, by design . Its mission is mercenary. Anyone can  confirm that fact by reading the Qur’an & hadith: 8:1, 41, & 67; 33:26,27; 48:20, Sahih Muslim 19.4327, Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220, 3.37.495 & 4.52.267

You can look up those references or you can search for and read “Islam’s Mercenary Mission”.

The fact is that Islam is martial, it ordains warfare for Muslims, the relationship between Allah and Muslims is master:slave; purchased to fight in his cause, kill and be killed.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped and to wage war against Jews & Christians until they are subjugated & make annual extortion payments.

Moe confirmed those imperatives, declaring that he was “ordered to fight”.

You can confirm those facts by reading the Qur’an & hadith: 8:69, 9:29, 9:123 & Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

Moe sent out extortion letters and followed up with his army. You can search for Muhammad’s letters and treaties and you can read Sahih Bukhari’s books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition.  Or you can search for, download and read Jihad.chm.

Moe was a terrorist and bragged about it.  You can verify this fact by reading Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 & 1.7.331  or you can search for, download and read Islamic Terror.chm.

You can find a substantial subset of the relevant quotes, linked to source, in my blog post: “What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?” You could look up the writings of Ibn Khaldun, Ibn Taymiyya, Qutb & Maududi.  You could look up Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 to verify the fact that the jihad imperatives are  codified in Shari’ah.   You could look up the “science of Naskh” to discover that the relatively tolerant and peaceful early Meccan verses have been abrogated by Surah al-Anfal & at-Taubah.

You could do the research, but you won’t, because you are a Liberal, and liberals know that they are superior, intellectually and morally.  Liberals know that their instincts are obviously correct, they do not require relevant, verifiable factual evidence.

The Examiner’s automated system responded with this message:

My comment did not contain any profanity, so I decided to go all the way with another attempt at commenting.

Fighting facts with personal denigration is unfair. Robert Spencer posts facts at Jihad Watch. I attempted to post references to the source documents, your automated system accused me of trying to post profanity and rejected my comment.
I will attempt to post links to my blog posts and compilations of posts which contain the relevant facts with links which will allow you to verify them and explore the context.

http://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/whats-wrong-with-islammuslims/

http://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/islam-vs-kuffar-adv-war/
http://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/park-51-place-of-salat/
Islamic Terror.chm:  http://www.box.net/shared/l9kl2j3xju
Jihad.chm:  http://www.box.net/shared/kpg3rjaqof

The second attempt produced exactly the same result.  When I attempted to post a message announcing my intent to create this post, I got a message saying that I had failed to enter the correct  characters, but no capcha form was visible. A latter attempt  was successful, but there was no capcha.

It is evident that LibTards are repelled by relevant, verifiable facts.  They do not want their emotion driven assumptions to be refuted with truth.

Here is the money quote (from FAIR):

“By selectively ignoring inconvenient Islamic texts and commentaries, Spencer concludes that Islam is innately extremist and violent.”

Lets get specific, which the LibTards won’t do.  Here is a sample of the “peaceful, tolerant ayat” which supposedly contradict Spencer’s evidence.

• 2:256. There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Tâghût and believes in Allâh, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.
• 5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.
• 10:99. And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them together. So, will you (O Muhammad ) then compel mankind, until they become believers.
  10:100. It is not for any person to believe, except by the Leave of Allâh, and He will put the wrath on those who are heedless.
• 109:6. “To you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islâmic Monotheism).”
• 16:125. Invite (mankind, O Muhammad ) to the Way of your Lord (i.e. Islâm) with wisdom (i.e. with the Divine Inspiration and the Qur’ân) and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.

The self-anointed experts who would so blithely dismiss Spencer’s arguments overlook the science of Naskh. When two ayat conflict, the ayeh revealed later abrogates the older ayeh. [2:106, 16:101]  Examine the sequence of revelation.

18 Kafirun 6 Mecca 109

51 Yunus 109 Mecca 10

70 Nahl 128 Mecca 16

87 Baqarah 286 Medina 2

88 Anfal 75 Medina 8

112 Maidah 120 Medina 5

113 Taubah 129 Medina 9

8:39 & 9:29 cancel out the more tolerant, peaceful verses.  Even though 5:32  is canceled out by Surah at-Taubah, lets consider the ayat which Muslims and their apologists never quote.

• 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

If you “wage war against Allah”, you  “shall be”: killed, crucified, have hand & foot cut off or exiled.  Why do Muslims practice kitman by concealing this verse?  Because of the definition of “wage war against Allah”.  Ibn Kathir provides that definition in his tafsir. [Emphasis added.]

• `Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land]

Disbelief in Allah constitutes waging war against him, subjecting one to the hudud listed in 5:33.   And they accuse us of cherry picking!

Examine  Surah at-Taubah 29 carefully, what does it command Muslims to do?

• 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

What does Islamic law say about that?  Lets consult Umdat al-Salik.

• THE OBJECTIVES OF JIHAD
  o9.R Thc caliph (025) makes war upon Jews,
  Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has
  first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,
  and if they will not, then invited them to
  enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim
  poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the
  significance of their paying it, not the money
  itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)
  (0: and the war continues) until they
  become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll
  tax (0: in accordance with the word of Allah Most
  High,
  “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and
  the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and
  His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice
  the religion of truth, being of those who have
  been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax
  out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9:29),
  the time and place for which is before the final descent
  of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his
  final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted
  from them. for taking the poll tax is only effective
  until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be
  peace), which is the divinely revealed law of
  Muhammad, The coming of Jesus does not entail
  a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule
  by the law of Muhammad, As for the Prophet’s
  saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
  “I am the last, there will be no prophet
  after me,”
  this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus
  (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule
  according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our
  Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)).

And the Jurists?  What did  Al-Shafi’i say?

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

What did Al-Ghazali say?

…one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year…

There is more Fiqh!

al-Shaybani, d. 803 / 5, Hanafi. Siyar, transl. Majid Khadduri, The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani’s Siyar (Baltimore 1966), p. 76-7, 87, 95-6, 100-1.

Quote:

Fight in the name of God and in the ”path of God” [i.e. truth]. Combat [only] those who disbelieve in God. Whenever you meet your polytheistic enemies, invite them [first] to adopt Islam. If they do so, accept it, and let them alone. […] If they refuse [to accept Islam], then call upon them to pay the jizya; if they do, accept it and leave them alone. If you besiege the inhabitants of a fortress or a town and they try to get you to let them surrender on the basis of God’s judgment, do not do so, since you do not know what God’s judgment is, but make them surrender to your judgment and then decide their case according to your own views.

Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani, d. 996, maliki. Cit. ur Leon Bercher, La risala ou epitre sur les elements du dogme de la loi d’Islam (Algiers 1945).

Quote:

Jihad is a precept of Divine institution. We Malikis maintain that it is preferable not to begin hostilities with the enemy before having invited the latter to embrace the religion of Allah except where the enemy attacks first. They have the alternative of either converting to Islam or paying the poll tax, short of which war will be declared against them.

Sheikh Burhanuddin Ali of Marghinan, d. 1196, hanafi. The Hidayah, cit. ur T.P. Hughes, A Dictionary of Islam (London 1895/1994), s. 244-5.

Quote:

The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect. […] When the Muslims enter the enemy’s country and besiege the cities or strongholds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them to embrace the faith, because Ibn Abbas relates of the Prophet that he never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the faith. If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary to war with them, because that which was the design of the war is then obtained without war. […] If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them […]

Molla Khosrew, d. 1480, hanafi. Kitab al-Gihad, övers. Nicola Melis, Trattato sulla guerra (Cagliari, Italien 2002), s. 95-6.

Quote:

[…] jihad is a fard al-kifaya, that is, that one must begin the fight against the enemy, even when he [the enemy] may not have taken the initiative to fight, because the Prophet […] early on […] allowed believers to defend themselves, later, however, he ordered them to take the initiative at certain times of the year, that is, at the end of the haram months, saying, ”Kill the idolaters wherever you find them” (Q9:5). He finally ordered fighting without limitations, at all times and in all places, saying, ”Fight those who do not believe in God, and in the Last Day” (Q9:29); there are also other [similar] verses on the subject. This shows that it is a fard al-kifaya.

“Islam is a great religion of peace”, yeah, right.   LibTards will never accept the evidence, no matter how much we present.  Evidence does not count, only emotion based assumptions count to LibTards.

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

Keith Olbermann made a slick, slimy spew of self-righteous drivel which disgusts me to an extreme degree.  I share it with you because  I need to expose Olbermann’s al-taqiyya & kitman.  If you can view and hear this spew of sophistry & sewage without smashing or spitting on your monitor, you are one tough cookie.

First They Came For The Building Permits… Keith Olbermann Special Comment On WTC Mosque

I found the transcript here, fortunately’  because Olbermann spews much faster than I can type and we need to freeze the stream in order to view the Turds floating by in the rapids.

The title  contains the first lie: …the inaccurately described “Ground Zero mosque.”  What is planned for the top floor?  Why did they include an Islamic prayer room?  Is it because  a few nearby Mosques are over crowded, with worshipers spilling out into the street?   So, regardless of the building’s other functions, its primary function is that of a Mosque.  If it was not a Mosque, it would not have a prayer room.

Next, Olbermann quotes Pastor Martin Niemoller as a slick equation of those who oppose the Ground Zero Mosque to Nazis.  Nazis rounded up innocent people and slaughtered them.  We rise up in opposition to the erection of a symbol of Islamic triumph & Supremacy.  We have no storm troopers, no force beyond our voices and our votes.

There follows an overloaded description of Niemoller.

“He witnessed persecution, he acquiesced to it, he ultimately fell victim to it. He had been a German World War 1 hero, then a conservative who welcomed the fall of German democracy and the rise of Hitler and had few qualms the beginning of the holocaust until he himself was arrested for supporting it insufficiently.”

Note how slickly Olbermann ties conservative to the fall of democracy, again calumniating conservatives by equating us with National Socialists. If God wanted to give the world an enema, he’d  insert the tube in Olbermann ‘s mouth.

The calumny continues with a malapropism.

“…In quoting him, I make no direct comparison between the attempts to suppress the building of a Muslim religious center in downtown Manhattan, and the unimaginable nightmare of the Holocaust. Such a comparison is ludicrous. At least it is, now.”

Olbermann has gone to some length to imply an equation between  the Holocaust and opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque, now he denies it, with a reservation.  Someone should set a beer trap for that slug.

Again, he invokes Niemoller as to support calumny.

“…He was warning of the willingness of a seemingly rational society to condone the gradual stoking of enmity towards an ethnic or religious group warning of the building-up of a collective pool of national fear and hate, warning of the moment in which the need to purge, outstrips even the perameters of the original scape-goating…”

Olbermann declares us irrational and accuses us of stoking enmity towards Muslims, as if we were wagging the dog, artificially creating a war.  His sly suggestion lies 180° out of phase with reality.  Nine years ago, 19 Muslims, motivated by Allah’s command to attack disbelievers and his promise of eternity in the celestial bordello, hijacked four airliners and flew three of them into occupied office structures.

Between our war of revolution and 1815, the Barbary Pirates, who happened to be Muslims, sacked our shipping, enslaved the crews and demanded tribute, which became the chief cause of federal debt at that time.   When asked by what right they attacked us, they had a ready response.

“The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

According to Olbermann, we are artificially “stoking enmity”  where none exists.  In reality, Islamic scripture, tradition and law require attacks upon us, promise paradise to those who engage in jihad and threaten shirkers with eternal damnation.

Olbermann continues to invoke Niemoller to calumniate us.

“He was warning of the thousand steps before a holocaust became inevitable. If we are at just the first of those steps again — today, here — it is one step too close.”

Olbermann accuses us to building up momentum for genocide.  I can not write for anyone else, but for my part, I seek no genocide. I seek the outlawing of Islam, the closure of its institutions and the denaturalization and deportation of its votaries.   There is no good reason to harbor, on our soil, an enemy fifth column whose scripture, tradition and cannon law require the prosecution of war upon us.

Olberman is in a state of denial.

“Yet, in a country dedicated to freedom, forces have gathered to blow out of all proportion the construction of a minor community center; to transform it into a training ground for terrorists and an insult to the victims of 9/11 and a tribute to medieval Muslim subjugation of the West.”

Proportion?  Usama hoped to destroy our economy and vitiate our will to resist. Nearly three thousand people died in that attack.  “Community center”?  A skunk by any other name will smell as pungent.  Build a Mosque, add a library, meeting rooms and swimming pool and it is no longer a Mosque.  No prayers for victory over the disbelieving people, no daily cursing of Jews & Christians, no preaching of Jihad, no collection of Zakat to finance war against us.  Oh, perish the thought.
Minor community center?  $5,000,000 acquisition costs plus $100,000,000 construction cost; minor indeed.  What would be major?  How about the annual operating costs of a 13 story building??  Who is paying for that minor community center, and why?

“There is no training ground for terrorists.”

Where to Muslims learn about their “religious obligation“, if not in the Mosque?  Perhaps they learn of it in community centers. Where do they obtain the fliers, books and cds that inculcate hatred and incite violence?

Insult to the victims?  Build a Mosque, a Muslim house of prayer, where Muslims will gather five times each day to curse us and pray for our defeat, where they will gather every  Friday afternoon to hear sermons  inciting jihad.  Build it where a landing gear landed after passing through one of the towers; where a cloud of dust and ash including human remains flowed through the street several stories deep.   No insult at all to the victims and their survivors.  When Muslims conquer an area,  after finishing the slaughter of innocents, they next tear down the local temple and replace it with a Mosque as a symbol of triumph and supremacy. Name it Cordoba House in honor of the symbol of the conquest of Spain.  No insult at all, perfectly inoffensive; yeah, right.

“There is, in fact, no “Ground Zero mosque.” It isn’t a mosque.”

What in Hell do they call Muslim prayer rooms??  If it ain’t a Mosque, why does it need an Imam?   Is Ground Zero a point, a dimensionless figure?  How can it be limited to the footprint of a few destroyed structures when other surrounding structures suffered damage and collected body parts on their roofs? If you ask me, Ground Zero extends as far as the dust clouds reached when the towers collapsed.

“A mosque is a Muslim holy place in which only worship can be conducted.”

They never do anything but pray in Mosques?  No weddings; no funerals?  No Jurgas? How about bomb building?  But bomb building is an act of worship.

Olbermann asserts that we are a threat to Muslims,  inverting reality.  At least one recent Mosque arson was perpetrated by a member of the congregation.   How does the number of attacks on Mosques compare to the  terrorist attacks recently failed or thwarted when the authorities got lucky?

“…terrorism by extremists who happen to be Muslim, and never face the shameful truth about our country: As the Jacksonville mosque bombing shows, since Sept. 11, Muslims have been at far greater risk of being victims of terrorism in the United States, than have non-Muslims.”

“Extremists” is a shibboleth. Moe, who founded Islam, bragged about being made victorious with terror. That makes him a terrorist. Emulating Moe is normative Islam, not extremism. One Mosque, one pipe bomb.  How many attacks on the WTC?  How many attempted bombings?  How many shootings? How many vehicular assaults?  Muslims are more at risk than we are. Yeah, right.

Back to the  name game.

“In Spain, in Cordoba, though the Muslims established multi-cultural, non-denominational institutions of learning, they were under constant attack from Christians, and from a series of internal all-Muslim Civil Wars.”

So they established schools, big deal. What was the status of conquered Jews & Christians?    Did Muslims treat them as equals?  Why were there 45 Christian martyrs? Muslims were under attack  from Christians, as if  trying to reverse Muslim conquest is a great evil.  Typical LibTard moral inversion.

Olberman continues  by  using argumentum Tu-Quoque  to divert our attention from  Islam.

“And is there not a logical extension to Mr. Gingrich’s conclusions about Cordoba and “triumphalism?” Virtually every church, every synagogue, indeed every mosque built on this continent stands where a Native American lived, or died, or was buried, or saw his world — his religions included — wiped out. By us.”

Watch the slick sleight of tongue.

“when the historical implications of Cordoba were made clear to the backers of this project, the property developer, Sharif Gamal, changed the name. They already compromised.”

As if the developer was unaware of the historical context!  A skunk by any other name will smell as pungent. Changing the name does not change the intent  neither does it change the effect.

Following more flatulence about the location, Olberman spouts off about churches in the area, neatly overlooking the fact that that area had  a largely Christian populace when those churches were constructed.  Further, he avoids the story of the St. Nicholas Church which was destroyed by  debris from the collapse.  The bureaucrats have delayed rebuilding for nine years yet they hasten to expedite construction of a Mosque.

“People hear “Ground Zero Mosque” and they think Mecca in the backyard and a loud call to prayer and they take umbrage.”:

What is it like at Masjid  Ar Rahman?

A summer’s night in Manhattan (and a ‘call to prayers’)

Who wants to hear that amplified caterwauling five times a day beginning at 4:30 a.m.??

Observe how he waves away  the concern of a  survivor.

“We got no more than a few inches of skin and a couple of pieces of bone. Ground Zero is the burial place of my son,” said Joyce Boland at the public hearing about the Center. “I don’t want to go there and see an overwhelming mosque looking down at me.”

I honor her pain, and her fear, but Mrs. Boland has nothing to worry about. Unless she walks directly to it, she’ll never see it. This is what you see from where the Center will be. Another non-descript building across the street. This building and others like it will block views of the Trade Center, and views from the Trade Center.”

How does Olbermann  know what routes Mrs. Boland will take through the city?  The Mosque will be reported in the news, common knowledge,  and survivors will know about it.  Muslims around the world will take pride and pleasure in it, viewing it as a symbol of triumph and supremacy.   That will be an advantage to  the terrorists for recruitment and financing.

In his self-righteous rant, Olbermann launches into kvetching about the invasion  of Iraq, a topic entirely irrelevant to the Ground Zero Mosque.  The invasion was poorly conceived and executed,  Shrub attempted to do it on the cheap, compromising with domestic  and international politics.

“We sacrificed 4,415 of our military personnel in Iraq to save Muslims, and there are thousands still there tonight to protect Muslims, but we don’t want Muslims to open a combination culinary school and prayer space in Manhattan?”

We sacrificed 4,415 and billions of dollars to political correctness, sending men where we should have sent nukes.  Everybody knows it but few have the courage to acknowledge objective factual reality.  We are losing in Afghanistan and Iraq. We will continue to lose so long as their populations and governments  remain Islamic.  We wasted blood and treasure because Shrub refused to identify the enemy.

Observe the flow of sludge.

“From the beginning of this nation we have fought prejudice and religious intolerance and our greatest enemy: stupidity, exploited by rapacious politicians.”

Islam epitomizes religious intolerance.   Olberman probably has not read the Qur’an. Take 3:85, for example.

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

Islam declares war on us, how tolerant is that?

Olberman continues to spew sludge.

“Despite the nobility of our founding and the indefatigable efforts of all our generations, there have always been those who would happily sacrifice our freedoms, our principles, to ward off the latest unprecedented threat, the latest unbeatable outsiders. Once again, at 45 Park Place, we are being told to sell our birth-right, to feed the maw of xenophobia and vengeance and mob rule.”

We will not sacrifice our freedoms; we seek to preserve our lives and liberties.  Claiming abridgment of religious liberty in this Mosque dispute is  a red herring. Islam is a war cult, not a legitimate religion.  It denies the sanctity of our lives and property; it declares and is prosecuting war against us.  Islam’s mission is mercenary: Moe’s personal emolument.  Anyone who will read and comprehend Surah al-Anfal will realize the truth of this matter.

Islam attacked us two hundred years ago, forcing us to go into debt to pay tribute, killing and enslaving sailors. It killed millions all over the world, yet it is dismissed as an imaginary threat even though it recently killed three thousand and tried to kill more.   The LibTard accuses us of abandoning freedom of religion  to spite Islam.  LibTards lack sufficient intelligence and knowledge to comprehend the fact that Islam denies freedom of religion.  It attacks people solely based on their rejection of Islam.  Christians are murdered with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria & Pakistan.  Their churches and houses are burned.  Islamic law imposes restrictions on Christians. Perhaps the LibTards should read it to see what they are supporting.

The spew continues.

“The terrorists who destroyed the buildings from which you could only see 45 Park Place as a dot on the ground, wanted to force us to change our country to become more like the ones they knew. What better way could we honor the dead of the World Trade Center, than to do the terrorists’ heavy lifting for them? And do you think 45 Park Place is where it ends?”

They seek to impose Islam upon us, to kill us or force us to convert.  Olbermann has the situation precisely inverted.  Eliminating Islam from our soil would reduce the risk of further terror attacks and preserve, not threaten our liberty.  Giving the enemy another base on our soil dishonors the victims in the worst way.

In his inverted way, Olberman gets one thing right.

“And in America, when somebody comes for your neighbor, or his bible, or his torah, or his Atheists’ Manifesto, or his Koran, you and I do what our fathers did, and our grandmothers did, and our founders did you and speak up.”

Islam seeks to impose its Shari’ah on us, to criminalize all  criticism and questioning of Islam.  They want to make the practice of Christianity illegal.  I want no part of it.  I want the enemy and his institutions  out of my country!   I do not want any enemy bases here!   That does not make me a bigot, racist or Nazi.

I want you to sign these petitions, share them with your friends, family & associates and make them go viral.  The text of those petitions contains the evidence which proves Olbermann wrong, exposing  Islamic aggression, genocide & terrorism.

International Qur’an Petition

Outlaw Islam!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam.

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

I was disgusted but not surprised by what I heard on the news broadcast about President Obama’s remarks at the White House Iftar.  I went in search of a transcript but did not find it at the White House web site. It turned up at a propaganda site for foreign consumption: America.gov.  My intention is to refute the treason lie by lie.  I will put  the lies in block quote format interspersed with my comments at full margin.  Use the link above if you want to read the whole screed uninterrupted.

And these events celebrate the role of faith in the lives of the American people. They remind us of the basic truth that we are all children of God, and we all draw strength and a sense of purpose from our beliefs.

“…We all draw strength and a sense of purpose from our beliefs.”  How beneficent, peaceful and spiritual.  Muslims draw a sense of purpose from their belief.  President Obama does not want us to examine that purpose.  Because I am an equal opportunity offender, I will reveal it to you as I found it in the Hilali & Khan Noble Qur’an.

• 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
  • Allah has purchased the Souls and Wealth of the Mujahidin in Return for Paradise
  • Tafsir al-Jalalayn
  • Tafsir Ibn Abbas
  • Maududi

The Muslim’s purpose is to fight in Allah’s cause; to make Islam dominate the entire world.  Their purpose is to conquer us.  Sweet, beneficent & spiritual indeed.

These events are also an affirmation of who we are as Americans.  Our Founders understood that the best way to honor the place of faith in the lives of our people was to protect their freedom to practice religion.  In the Virginia Act of Establishing Religion Freedom, Thomas Jefferson wrote that “all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion.”  The First Amendment of our Constitution established the freedom of religion as the law of the land.  And that right has been upheld ever since.

Freedom of religion, a foundational virtue of America; how noble of President Obama to affirm it.  President Obama applies it to Islam, accepting the common fallacious assumption that Islam is a religion.  In fact, Islam is a “deen”–way of life which encompasses all aspects of human life, including faith.  Islam’s faith component serves two purposes: it prevents us from perceiving the reality of Islam’s mission and it motivates Muslims to fight, kill and be killed in world conquest.

We see Muslims raising their butts to the moon and hear them howling.  How sweet, they are praying to their god,  Islam must be a religion, beneficent, anodyne; an equally valid pathway to the sublime.   But what are they really doing?  Each time they pray, they recite the first Surah, which includes these verses.

• 1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
  1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
  • The Faithful ask for and abide by Guidance
  • 2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

They are cursing us. Five times each day they remind Allah of our going astray and earning his anger.  Nay more. They are declaring war upon us.  “Guide us to the straight way” Note the title of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir:  Guidance. Moe had a most interesting application for that word.

• “May peace be on him who follows the guidance…”
• “…Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”… Sahih Bukhari 4.52.386

What happens to those who do not follow the guidance?  Moe sent an extortion letter to Persia, whose Emperor rejected it. Caliph Umar sent his army.

Indeed, over the course of our history, religion has flourished within our borders precisely because Americans have had the right to worship as they choose — including the right to believe in no religion at all.

Islam does not  honor freedom of religion.  Where Islam conquers, pagans & atheists must be slain or enslaved if not converted.  “People of the Book“  must be subjugated and make annual extortion payments for the privilege of living as less than second class citizens.  Conquered Christians living in dhimmitude are not permitted to build or repair churches, display crosses, ring bells or pray aloud in public.  Muslims who abandon Islam must be executed.

a nation where the ability of peoples of different faiths to coexist peacefully and with mutual respect for one another stands in stark contrast to the religious conflict that persists elsewhere around the globe.

“Mutual respect”, another virtue lacking in Islam.  Our blood & property are not sacred to Muslims; we have no rights until we become Muslims.

• Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
  Narrated Anas bin Malik:
  Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Here comes the setup; wait for the but clause.

Now, we must all recognize and respect the sensitivities surrounding the development of Lower Manhattan.  The 9/11 attacks were a deeply traumatic event for our country.  And the pain and the experience of suffering by those who lost loved ones is just unimaginable.  So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders.  And Ground Zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.

Can you  imagine the feelings of the spouses and children whose loved ones went to work and never returned?  How did the survivors of victims of Flight 93 feel when they heard that cockpit voice recording?  I cursed Islam until my throat was too sore to continue, and I did not have any friends or family directly involved.

But let me be clear.  As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country.

How in Hell can they have a right to wage war against us ?  How in Hell can they have a right to enslave & rape our widows and orphans?  Jihad is part of Islam. It involves killing. Moe gave tacit approval to rape  captive women.

What is their “religion”?  In this hadith, I will emphasize the critical parts for clarity. Read it slowly, then re-read it for full comprehension.

• Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:
  Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
  I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What would they abandon?  What would they return to?  What is their “religion”?

• O9.0 “…Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion..”…http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-0.html

Participation in jihad is a “religious obligation” classified as fard al-kifaya; binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have responded to the call.  It is not possible for Muslims to practice Islam  without engaging in or supporting  jihad until the entire world is conquered.

• O9.1 “…If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….” http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-1.html

And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.

What do they do in that “place of worship” , five times each day?  And why in that location?  When Muslims conquer an area, they first tear down the local temple and replace it with a Mosque as a symbol of supremacy & triumph.  Why is Hagia Sophia a Mosque?  Why is there a Mosque on the Temple Mount?

This is America.  And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable.  The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are.  The writ of the Founders must endure.

Can religious freedom be extended to those who do not grant it?  Can those be welcome here who assert a divine mandate to conquer us?   The Founders did not anticipate modern transportation & emigration.  They had no reason to expect Muslims to come here. Now they are here as an enemy fifth column, using our Constitutional rights as a weapon against us.

And let us also remember who we’re fighting against, and what we’re fighting for.

No American President has  correctly identified the enemy who attacked us nine years ago and continues to p;lot attacks against us.  That enemy is Islam, the same enemy that sacked our merchant marine between 1791 & 1815.  Its name is Islam; no elected official will acknowledge that fact.  They are cowardly traitors.   We are fighting for life & liberty which we hold dear and Islam denigrates & denies to its victims.

.Our enemies respect no religious freedom.

Lives must be mixed with truth to maximize their effects. There is the little bit of truth in Obama’s slew of lies.

Al Qaeda’s cause is not Islam — it’s a gross distortion of Islam.

Al Qaeda is al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, as is HAMAS.

• Article One:

  The Islamic Resistance Movement: The Movement’s programme is Islam. From it, it draws its ideas, ways of thinking and understanding of the universe, life and man. It resorts to it for judgement in all its conduct, and it is inspired by it for guidance of its steps.

• Article Eight:

  Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.

Its Islam, stupid! Why in Hell is it called the “Muslim Brotherhood”?  Al-Qaeda & HAMAS, etc.  are Islam, not separate, independent  entities.

These are not religious leaders — they’re terrorists who murder innocent men and women and children.

Was Moe a religious leader?  He founded Islam, was he a religious leader or not?  He said that killing children would profane a holy war because they are part of the spoils.  He also gave tacit approval to killing them in night raids. “They are from them.” They are terrorists; what was Moe? “…I have been made victorious with terror…”

And the reason that we will win this fight is not simply the strength of our arms — it is the strength of our values.  The democracy that we uphold. The freedoms that we cherish.  The laws that we apply without regard to race, or religion, or wealth, or status.  Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect towards those who are different from us –- and that way of life, that quintessentially American creed, stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today.

How in the eternal Hellfire can anyone respect or tolerate Islam?  Only by ignorance, or by being part of that damnable cult!   It is Islam, stupid; perpetual war, denial of rights and dignity; subjugation of minorities and women. It is Islam, stupid.  We were attacked by 19 Muslims, motivated by the promise of eternity in the celestial bordello.  Allah purchased them for that purpose, with that promise.  Fools, morons and the willfully blinded can not connect the data points.

But time and again, the American people have demonstrated that we can work through these issues, and stay true to our core values, and emerge stronger for it.  So it must be — and will be — today.

Islam does not share our values, it contravenes them.  Islam is here to conquer us, not to assimilate. It is an enemy, not  part of our tradition.

And tonight, we are reminded that Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity.  And Ramadan is a reminder that Islam has always been a part of America.

Shi’ia, Sunni & Sufi all have something in common.  What is it?  Allah’s imperatives.  What did Allah command them to do?  What did Moe say he was commanded to do?   How does that relate to 9/11?  What part of America was Islam when Thomas Jefferson was President?  Why did  he say “Millions for defense. But not one cent for tribute. “? Without the attacks of  the Barbary Pirates, we might not have a Marine Corps.  That is a substantial contribution, ain’t it.

Muslim American clerics have spoken out against terror and extremism, reaffirming that Islam teaches that one must save human life, not take it.

Snake Excrement!!!  No cleric has condemned Allah’s Gd’d imperatives, nor will they.  To condemn these is to sign your death warrant.

• 8:39
• 9:29
• 9:123
• 8:12
• 8:60

Show me, by God, one fatwa from one qualified  Muslim cleric, specifically & explicitly abjuring those ayat!!!`

No cleric has condemned Moe’s Gd’d bragging about victory through terrorism.

• Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331
• Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220

Show me, by God, one fatwa from one qualified  Muslim cleric, specifically & explicitly abjuring those ahadith!!!  They have not and they will not because those ayat & ahadith are part of Islamic law.  Instead they blather about how Islam forbids killing innocents, relying on our definition of innocent, while remembering their own.  Islam holds that only Muslims are innocent, all others are rebels against Allah, deserving to be killed.  They love to quote 5:32 but never quote 5:33 and they will never tell you about Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of 5:33 which exposes the key definition: “waging war against Allah”  = disbelief.

And Muslim Americans serve with honor in our military.

Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, S.O.A. & Sgt. Asan Akbar  for example?

For in the end, we remain “one nation, under God, indivisible.”  And we can only achieve “liberty and justice for all” if we live by that one rule at the heart of every great religion, including Islam — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.

Liberty & justice are not advanced by allowing their sworn enemies to occupy us as a fifth column and erect symbols of their triumph over our battlefields.  Islam attacks, it kills, it enslaves; it does not live and let live.  It has no golden rule.   President Obama is one of them, not one of us.

 

WesternFront America

Barenaked Islam quoted  a New York Times article: Across Nation, Mosque Projects Meet Opposition,  which first lists several locations where opposition  to Mosque construction has arisen and then brings out the key revelation.

“In all of the recent conflicts, opponents have said their problem is Islam itself. They quote passages from the Koran and argue that even the most Americanized Muslim secretly wants to replace the Constitution with Islamic Shariah law.”

Either the opponents have begun to study the enemy’s canon or they have been emboldened to  use to a new level of direct counter attack on the ideological plane. The next paragraph trots out the implicit false premise: “Islam is a religion, equal  to Christianity and must be tolerated as such as a matter of First Amendment right.”

“These local skirmishes make clear that there is now widespread debate about whether the best way to uphold America’s democratic values is to allow Muslims the same religious freedom enjoyed by other Americans, or to pull away the welcome mat from a faith seen as a singular threat.” [Emphasis added for clarity.]

Many left wingers are slick in their use of loaded expressions.  “America’s democratic values” is heavily laden with all things bright and beautiful.  The use of that expression lays the foundation for accusing Islam’s opponents of racism, bigotry & xenophobia.    They are off to a fast start, ahead of the starter’s pistol, mis-framing the debate.  Only religions are protected by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause.  They have evaded\ the crucial question: “Is Islam a religion worthy of First Amendment protection?”.

It has a scripture, it has theology, it has cosmology, it prays, it sways, it practices charity; it must be a religion.  Yeah, right.  Islam is a deen: way of life which dictates all aspects of human life. One critical aspect of that way of life makes it incompatible with our Constitution and intolerable in our society.  Open your eyes and prepare to learn; I am about to show you something that nobody else will expose you to.  This oral tradition exposes the reality of the Islamic deen.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Moe presented jihad and agriculture as alternatives, the former being acceptable to Allah and the latter carrying a curse.   Allah will curse the Muslims if they abandon jihad in exchange for agriculture.  Jihad Akbar is striving against your ego and temptations.  Is Jihad Akbar an alternative to farming for a living?  Jihad asghar is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims“.  Is that an alternative to farming as a way of making a living?   For the answer, examine this hadith, which Khan bowdlerized but Aisha Bewley included in her translation of Sahih Bukhari.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

How did Moe make his living?  By his spear.  Was it by hunting wild game?  Is the life style of a hunter/gatherer consistent with making commands; abasing and humiliating anyone who disobeys? What kind of command is involved in that saying? Here is one sample.

… I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me….[LETTER TO THE CHIEFS OF AQABA]

Moe sent a letter to Christians, giving them the choice of conversion to Islam, dhimmitude & Jizya or war.  He commanded people to submit to Islam and attacked them if they refused.   What is consistent with issuing commands and punishing the disobedient?  Pillage & plunder.   Do you see the pattern yet?

For those who can not perceive the pattern, I have more clues from the Qur’an: Surah al-Anfal:; “Spoils of War”.  To whom do the spoils belong? How are they allocated?  What was Moe’s motivation?

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad ) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

Moe gets the spoils; the  best 20% off the top. Moe’s motivation was the spoils & ransom for captives.  We  have it on Allah’s authority.   But spoilation was taboo among Arabs, how did Moe get away with it?  Allah gave him special dispensation.  Nay more! Allah gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world.  How did Allah make Moe wealthy?

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. ”
[Emphasis added for clarity.]

Islam’s mission is mercenary, neither spiritual nor eleemosynary. This fact alone is sufficient to disqualify Islam from First Amendment protection.  There is another fact, equally potent as a disqualifier:  Islam is permanent war.  Moe created Islam for his personal emolument & empowerment, which were dependent on constant warfare. He began with razia on camel caravans,  graduated to ghazwat against local Jewish settlements, and went on to conquer Mecca and threaten nearby kingdoms and empires.

Since Moe was  the self-appointed spokesman for Allah, he had Allah issue commandments.  Two of them are crucial to the question before us.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

• Ibn Kathir
• al-Jalalayn
• Ibn Abbas
• Maududi
• Reliance of the Traveller

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

• Ibn Kathir
• al-Jalalayn
• Ibn Abbas
• Maududi
• Reliance of the Traveller

Those are commands, imperatives, not suggestions; not metaphors, not allegories.  They have neither geographic nor chronological limits; they are outcome oriented, of global scope.  I gave you links to four tafsirs and Islamic law for a reason: so that you can verify what I have written.  Those tafsirs  deny the mercenary motivation clearly exposed by Allah’s own testimony in 8:67: “You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives)”. None of them denies the fard al-kifaya of annual ghazwat.  None of them asserts limits of time or geography.  None of them asserts an expiration date.

Besides bing fard al-kifaya, jihad is the essence of the relationship between Allah and the believers; he purchased them as slaves so that “…they kill (others) and are killed.“.

What makes  jihad  holy?  Is it fighting to establish the religion? [Read the footnote to 2:190.] No!  Jihad is only holy if nobody embezzles the spoils!

Sahih Muslim 19.4294: “…Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children….”

Jihad would be profaned by embezzling the spoils, which belong to Moe, fleeing from battle and mutilation  which was another  taboo.  Killing women and children  is prohibited because they were part of the booty, dead bodies had no value on the slave market. If you retain any doubt about this disgusting fact, I have some references for you: 33:26-27, Ibn Kathir and  Ibn Taymiyyah {“property for Muslims”}.

What is the importance of Jihad?

“Abdullah Humaid (Shaykh). “… Besides these acts of worship, a Muslim is directed to abstain from evil deeds and to perform good deeds, so that he may achieve success in the Hereafter, as well as, in the life of this world. But, as regards the reward and blessing, there is one deed which is very great in comparison to all the acts of worship and all the good deeds-and that is Jihad!”

By what stretch of the imagination is a mercenary and martial institution which wages war against us to be greeted with a welcome mat and given the protection which the First  Amendment extends to legitimate religions?  Given the fact that offensive jihad is a required  part of the practice of Islam, how can there be a right to practice Islam here?

The Times tells us that there is a “growing cottage industry of authors and bloggers”  who testify against Islam and “interfaith groups led by Protestant ministers, Catholic priests, rabbis and clergy members of other faiths” who defend Mosques.  They don’t tell us about the fact that only one side has relevant, verifiable evidence to support its case.  Throughout this post you will find links to source documents.  They are bold, blue underlined text. When clicked, they open  a relevant document in a new window.

At the end of the article, the times quotes a spokeswoman for one Mosque.

“Camie Ayash, a spokeswoman for the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, lamented that people were listening to what she called “total disinformation” on Islam. … “A lot of Muslims came to the U.S. because they respect the Constitution,” she said. “There’s no conflict with the U.S. Constitution in Shariah law. If there were, Muslims wouldn’t be living here.”

Does Shari’ah conflict with our Constitution and laws or not?  Reliance of the Traveller is a 1251 page book, translated from Umdat as Salik.  It is acknowledged by the Sheikhs at Al-Azhar University to be an authentic handbook of Islamic law.  We  have freedom of religion. American citizens can choose their own religion, and switch at will.  Muslims governed by Shari’ah can not. A Muslim who  apostatizes must be executed.

O8.1  When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2  In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.  http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO8-2.html

Does that Islamic law conflict with our organic law or does it not?

Islamic law concerning marriage and divorce can be somewhat shocking to the western mind.

M3.13: Guardians Who May Marry a Virgin to a Man Without Her Consent

Guardians are of two types, those who may compel their female charges to marry someone, and those who may not.

-1- The only guardians who may compel their charge to marry are a virgin bride’s father or father’s father, compel meaning to marry her to a suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.

-2- Those who may not compel her are not entitled to marry her to someone unless she accepts and gives her permission.
Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or father’s father may marry her to someone without her permission, though it is recommended to ask her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin’s silence is considered as permission.

As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one may marry her to another after she has reached puberty without her express permission, no matter whether the guardian is the father, father’s father, or someone else.

The father of a prepubescent girl can marry her off without her consent.  Is that or is  that not in conflict with our laws?   What if she refuses

O1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation:
…
-4- a father or mother (or their fathers of mothers) fir killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring;
-5- nor is retaliation permissible to a descendant for (A: his ancestor’s) killing someone whose death would otherwise entitle the descendant to retaliate, such as when his father kills his mother.

Honoricide, anyone?  But, of course, there is no conflict between Shari’ah and our Constitution.

Now, back to the topic of divorce.

Chapter N3.0: The Words that Effect a Divorce
N3.2 Using plain words to effect a divorce means expressly pronouncing the word divorce (O: or words
derived from it).  When the husband says’ “I divorce you,” or “You are divorced,” the wife is divorced
whether he has made the intention or not.
(A: Here and in the rulings below, expressions such as “The wife is divorced,” or “The divorce is effected,” mean just one of the three times (def: n9.0(N:) ) necessary to finalize it, unless the husband thereby intends a two-or threefold divorce (dis: n3.5) or repeats the words three times.)

Is the Islamic law of divorce consistent with ours, or does it conflict?

Lets touch upon a subject which, though not directly  involved in the federal  organic law,  does involve the Constitutions of the several states: duties of the governor.

O25.9  Authority in view of merit is that which is freely invested by the caliph through his own choice, and entails delegating a given limitary function and the use of judgement within a range of familiar alternatives. This investiture consists of the caliph appointing an individual to independently govern a city or region with authority over all its inhabitants and discretion in familiar affairs for all matters of government, including seven functions:

-1- raising and deploying armies on the frontiers and fixing their salaries, if the caliph has not already done so;
-2- reviewing laws and appointing judges and magistrates;
-3- collecting the annual rate (khiraj) from those allowed to remain on land taken b Islamic conquests, gathering zakat from those obliged to pay, appointing workers to handle it, and distributing it to eligible recipients;
-4- protecting the religion and the sacrosanct, preserving the religion from alteration and substitution;
-5- enforcing the prescribed legal measures connected with the rights of Allah and men;
-6- leading Muslims at group and Friday prayers, whether personally or by representative;
-7- facilitating travel to the hajj for both pilgrims from the regian itself and those passing through from elsewhere, that they may proceed to the pilgrimage with all necessary help,
-8- and if the area has a border adjacent to enemy lands, an eighth duty arises, namely to undertake jihad against enemies, dividing the spoils of battle among combatants, and setting aside fifth (def: o10.3) for deserving recipients.

Revisit the last item in that list. The local governor has a duty to undertake jihad against neighboring enemies and dividing the spoils.  Does that or does that not conflict with our federal and state Constitutions?  We have been assured that there is no conflict between Shari’ah and our Constitution.   What is the truth of the matter?  Does our Constitution guarantee freedom of religion?  How about Shari’ah?

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ). [Emphasis and link added for clarity.]

The caliph makes war upon Jews & Christians until they become Muslim or pay extortion, in obedience to 9:29.  But, we are assured that this does not conflict with our Constitution.  I doubt that many Muslims have read it.  Of course there is a perfect right to build Mosques & Madrassahs wherein to preach the obligation (fard al-kifaya) of jihad. And its perfectly alright to  send 1\8 of the charity collected to those waging war against us.

H8.7: The Eight Categories of Recipients

It is obligatory to distribute one’s zakat among eight categories of recipients (O: meaning that zakat goes to none besides them), one-eighth of the zakat to each category. (n: In the Hanafi school, it is valid for the giver to distribute his zakat to all of the categories, some of them, or to confine himself to just one of them (al-Lubab fi sharh al-Kitab(y88), 1.155). ) …

H8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

The seventh category is those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).  They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there, even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Didn’t President Obama have something to say about Zakat at Cairo?  “That’s why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill Zakat.”  Who did the Holy Land Foundation send $13. million to?  Why was that a big deal, requiring two trials in federal court?

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

Google brought me news of “When Islam Acts Like a Conquering Army“, at AINA.  The article turned out to be critical of Mayor Bloomberg’s treacherous policy as a surrender to Islam but it was written by a Muslim of Syrian heritage: Farid Ghadry. A visit to Wikipedia  turned up some information. Ghadry is the founder of a Syrian reform party.  He appears to be a study in contradiction: democratic Muslim.

I found Ghadry’s blog and checked to see if  there was more, but found that AINA had published the entire article. I want to share the conclusion with you.

… If we let Saudi Arabia fund and build the Mosque in New York as a token of their triumphalism over the US for 9/11, we are in fact not applying the Freedom of Religion laws but rather, we are giving my religion the chance to conquer New York by planting its flag of victory.

Farid Ghadry either knows who is behind the Ground Zero Mosque or is making the obvious assumption.  Note the caustic language coming from a Muslim: “token of their triumphalism”… “planting its flag of victory”.  It is clear that he understands what is happening and that he does not approve.

Mayor Bloomberg is focused on one set of laws when he should be investigating every religious edict or Fatwa of Islam that emanated from our scholars the last 25 years. But what if religion acts like a conquering army? How could we reconcile this fact with our laws? Being an American, laws will always prevail, but being a Muslim also, I have a warning: We will conquer you if you do not change your laws accordingly.

The US better reconcile between Freedom of Religion and Islam as a conquering army soon. The two cannot co-exist for long.

Mayor Bloomberg focuses on the First Amendment, incorrectly applying the definition of religion, which does not apply to Islam.  The idea that a Mayor could or would keep track of the entire  contemporary  output of the Ulema is beyond the pale. Most Governors and even most Presidents won’t even keep abreast of the established fiqh of jihad.

Islam does not “act like a conquering army”,  it is a complex, multi-faceted institution, whose most important facet is a conquering army.  Since Islam is at war against us, it can not be treated as a religion under the umbrella of the First Amendment’s free exercise clause.  It can not have a right to wage war against us from our own territory and it can’t have a right to erect a symbol of triumph to serve as an arsenal, recruitment & training center two blocks from the scene of its most successful attack.

We have been warned, by a Muslim, that Islam will conquer us if we do not change our laws to exclude it from First Amendment protection.  We have a Muslim using expressions  that do not pass the lips of the most articulate  expert “Islamophobes”.  If Islam is a conquering army, it can not be considered a religion for First Amendment purposes.  The process is one of decision making and Constitutional  amendment, not reconciliation.

The Cordoba House project is one skirmish on the psychological battle plane.  If we win it, Islamic jihad suffers a  psychological loss, whose effect will probably be minor and temporary.  If we lose this skirmish, Islamic jihad will achieve a great victory which will spur its cause by aiding recruitment, financing and morale.  The effects will be intense in the short term and project into the long term.  We will suffer a psychological defeat affecting our will and resolve to continue resistance to Islam’s onslaught.

Islam takes a long view. Like Wylie Coyote, it is persistent, always licking its wounds, regrouping, rearming and preparing new tactics for the next attack. It did not conquer Constantinople on the first try, but it persisted.   We beat the crap out of Germany twice, each time thinking that the victory was permanent. It was not the first time   We can not apply that model to Islam.  We defeated Islam in 1805 & 18:15.   Islam can not be permanently defeated, it must be rendered extinct.

In the short term, we must stop the Ground Zero Mosque.  Sign this petition and the others which are circulating on the web.    If possible, attend the protest September 11.  In the near term, we must amend the Constitution to acknowledge the fact that Islam is perpetual war, not a religion.   Sign the Outlaw Islam! petition.  Exhort your friends, family & associates to sign those petitions.

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America

I have long maintained that the most intelligent Englishmen came to America, leaving the dullards behind.  It seems that Alex Massie wants to prove my case.  His blog post turned up in one of my Google Alerts. He had written an arrogant, mocking post about the opposition to the Cordoba House project, followed up by a mockery of the readers who commented on the first post.  It was the second post that triggered the alert.

The initial post began this way, setting the tone for the series.

Yes, when I first read about plans for a mosque “at Ground Zero” my initial reaction was to wonder why, whatever the merits of an Islamic Cultural Centre in Lower Manhattan, such a project had to be built in such a location. It seemed likely to cause offense even if none were intended.

The reaction to the Cordoba House initiative, however, has changed my mind: I now think not only is there no reason not to carry on with the project but that, contra its critics, it now must be built a couple of blocks from the site of the former World Trade Center.

” It seemed likely to cause offense even if none were intended.”  That happens to be the standard argument against the project.  I have not used it in my postings on the subject, because I regard it as invalid.  Offense is intended and irrelevant. Muslims build Mosques on the sites of former temples as a sign of Islamic supremacy and triumph.  Such Mosque  building is an intentional insult to conquered people.

While the intended insult may be very sharp to the families of a few of the 3000 victims, others will fail to recognize it and go on with their lives diminished as they are by their tragic loss.  On the tactical plane, their suffering is insignificant. The significance lies in the psychology of the other side.

In ’01, Usama bin Laden spoke about the “strong horse“.

when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse. This is only one goal; those who want people to worship the lord of the people, without following that doctrine, will be following the doctrine of Muhammad, peace be upon him.

Bin Laden comes from a tribal and predatory culture. Predators look for signs of weakness, selecting for the first attack, the victim that appears to be least able to out run them or offer effective resistance.  Muslims are evaluating our will and ability to resist.  Every sign of weakness gives them encouragement, which benefits their recruitment and funding drives.  Our failure to win in Korea & Vietnam did not go unnoticed.  Our failure to react effectively to the seizure of our Embassy in Tehran  and our ignominious withdrawal from Somalia  were the icing on the cake.  Having ousted the Soviet Union from Afghanistan, Bin Laden was ready for a new easy prey.

Those who pontificate from the throne of ignorance do not understand the psychology involved, nor  Allah’s promise.

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

The Qur’an is primarily about incentivizing  jihad and persuading Muslims to march forth in it. Minimize the risks, maximize the rewards.   Every time we make a concession to Muslims or fail to respond forcefully and with resolve to an insult from them, we add to our image as the weak horse, emboldening the enemy and inviting a fresh attack.

They pronounced the takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews.  Five times every day they recite it in the call to prayer and in their  prayers they recite it again.  “Allah is greater.”   Where?  Two blocks, about six hundred feet from the site of the towers.  Part of one of the jets penetrated the roof of the Burlington Coat Factory outlet and ended up in its basement.  That site is an extension of ground zero.  Building a Mosque there is a sign of Islam’s triumph.  It is the ultimate insult, not only to the families of the victims, but to every person who desires to live as a freeman.  Allowing that insult to go unanswered is  sign of weakness and lack of will; an invitation: “hit us again, please”; “thank you, may I have another.”

Do you know what they do when they pray?  Do they recite the ten commandments?   Do they recite the Lord’s Prayer?  Surely  their ritual must be as innocuous.  Yeah, right.  Five times a day they curse us by reciting Surah al-Fatihah.  Seven short verses, what is the big deal?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

Go read the context and read the footnotes.  They are reminding Allah of how he hates us and wants to burn us.  Got a clue yet?  For the slow segment of the audience, I have another clue.

3:87. They are those whose recompense is that on them (rests) the Curse of Allâh, of the angels, and of all mankind.
9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Alex is on a roll, revealing how his mind was changed by the critics of the project, citing Mayor  Giuliani as his exemplar.

The people responsible for changing my mind are those Republicans and cultural conservatives most opposed to the plan. Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich are merely the more high-profile “campaigners” protesting that the proposed centre is offensive or that it “stabs the heart” or represents an American capitulation to “radical Islam”. Rudy Giuliani’s reaction was equally typical:

“This is a desecration,” he added. “Nobody would allow something like that at Pearl Harbor. Let’s have some respect for who died there and why they died there. Let’s not put this off on some kind of politically correct theory.

“I mean, they died there because of Islamic extremist terrorism. They are our enemy, we can say that, the world will not end when we say that. And the reality is, it will not and should not insult any decent Muslim because decent Muslims should be as opposed to Islamic extremism as you and I are.”

It is a desecration, in the tradition of  Ayodhya and Constantinople.  Islam has a pattern of demolishing temples and churches, replacing them with Mosques.  It is the insult which adds to the injury of conquest and genocide.   Have we allowed a Shinto shrine at  Pearl Harbor? Why not?

Respect  for those who died there?  Rudy, their cremains went to the landfill. They are dead, no further injury can be done to them.  Our concern should be for the living who will be maimed and killed in the next attack if we don’t preventing it by getting the Muslims out of here and keeping them out of  here before they succeed again.

No, Rudy, they died  because of Islam. Extremism is a meaningless shibboleth which serves to distract us from an unpalatable reality.  The enemy is Islam. It needs no adjectives or qualifiers.  The accursed abomination flows directly from Moe’s recitation and sunnah just as the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides did.

Decent Muslim?  Decent Muslim??  Decent Muslim???  Jesus Christ!!!!  It is the ultimate idiocy; the perfected oxymoron.  These politicians insult our intelligence every time they open their mouths to lie.  “Kill them wherever you find them.”  “Fight them until…” “Fight those who…”  Get a clue!  No decent person worships a demon who demands great slaughter as a precondition of entry into Paradise.  No decent man worships a demon who commands him to wage war upon us until we cease to resist and worship only that demon.  No decent man worships a demon who commands him to wage war upon us until we are subjugated and extorted.  No decent person regards as a saint and seeks to emulate a man who took sex slaves from captive women and permitted his army to rape captives.   Muslims worship Allah. Muslims emulate Muhammad bin Abdullah.  No decent person does that.

A few of them may not know about the doctrines of jihad, genocide and terror. They are Muslims because their ancestors were given the choice of Islam or death.  They may be Muslins in name only.  They may not really believe.  But we will not hear any of them publicly abjuring the doctrines enshrined in Surah al-Anfal & Surah at-Taubah and exemplified in the books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition of Sahih Bukhari.  Islam is all or nothing, not a la carte.

For those who are not regular readers of my blog posts, the documentation necessary to comprehend the offensive reality of the preceding paragraph is found here:  What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?

Instead of addressing the substance of Giuliani’s statement, Alex spews the usual LeftTard crap.

If any of this was true then, yes, the objections would have some merit and might even be persuasive. But it’s not. First, the cultural and community centre – which will, yes, include a prayer room – is not actually being built at Ground Zero but two blocks away (which, as anyone who knows NYC knows means it is not next door or on the same site at all) and that, moreover, Park Place is hardly connected to the former WTC site at all.  And in any case, muslims have been using the site as an overflow prayer room for a Tribeca mosque for some time anyway without anyone being upset.

Mosque & prayer room are the same entity.  The Mosque is the central purpose of the proposed structure, the rest is persiflage.  Two blocks, big deal!  How much of the debris had to be swept  from Park Street?  One landing gear is in the basement, that makes it part of the battlefield.  Perhaps it did not upset you, Alex, but it outraged me when I found out about it.

So Muslims have a Constitutional right to erect Mosques and worship?  Do they?  Islam is not severable, it is all or nothing. Muslims can not keep the nice parts and discard jihad, genocide and terror, those are a regular part of worshiping Allah.  Attacking kuffar every year is fard al kifaya, a religious obligation.
http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-1.html

What must a Muslim do to avoid eternity in the fire?  Do you have a clue?  Surah as-Saff would inform you most explicitly if you would read the last four  of its ts fourteen verses. What condemns a Muslim to the fire? Failure to join the jihad.  What is the relationship between Allah and Muslims?  They are his slaves.  What is their mission?  Killing us.  If they have a right to practice Islam, then our rights are abrogated.

Tolerance, respect and rights do not work unless they are reciprocal.  Islam does not reciprocate.  Read this hadith carefully, paying close attention to the  clauses to which I added emphasis.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Muslims are commanded to fight us. Our blood and property are not sacred to them and we have no rights until we join them in slavery to Allah.  Do you understand why Islam can not be tolerated?

Originally posted at Ben’s Blog © Dajjal

 

WesternFront America