You are here: Home » Society » Are we Reliving in 1930? Openly Stated Plans for Conquest

Are we Reliving in 1930? Openly Stated Plans for Conquest

Matt Ross | June 15, 2010 | 0 Comments

Last week, we discussed the rise (or unmasking) of anti-semitism. However, that is not the only aspect of the 1930’s that seems to be rearing its ugly head. There are some groups out there that are bent on conquest.

Factor Two: Open Calls for Conquest/Expansion.

The 1930’s were marked by calls for territorial expansion. Hitler demanded his “Lebensraum,” translated: “living space.” Mussolini called for a revived “Roman Empire.” Japan demanded territorial expansion to secure the raw materials to grow its industrial economy. In the case of Hitler and Mussolini, the intentions to expand were openly stated. It was no mystery. The intent was clearly stated in print, and said in speeches. Mussolini got a head start when he invaded Ethiopia in the 30’s, but all and all, most of the world failed to take these statements seriously. After all, these were loud, silly men that wore silly uniforms…right?

Then, the world was amazed when those silly men actually followed through on those plans.

But what about now? There are two groups (that have great relevance to Americans) who are speaking of conquest. The first is Islam.

The Caliphate:

The term Caliphate refers to an Islamic system of government based on Shariah Law. There is a worldwide desire to form a new Caliphate, which would eliminate boundaries of all Islamic nations.

Before you think that this is simply out of the mouth of Osama Bin Laden, take a look at this from American Thinker:

Nearly a century later, the preponderance of contemporary mainstream Muslims from Morocco to Indonesia, apparently share with their murderous, jihad terror waging co-religionists from al-Qaeda the goal (if not necessarily supporting the gruesome means) of re-establishing an Islamic Caliphate. Polling data just released (April 24, 2007) in a rigorously conducted face-to-face University of Maryland/ WorldPublicOpinion.org interview survey of 4384 Muslims conducted between December 9, 2006 and February 15, 2007-1000 Moroccans, 1000 Egyptians, 1243 Pakistanis, and 1141 Indonesians-reveal that 65.2% of those interviewed-almost 2/3, hardly a “fringe minority”-desired this outcome (i.e., “To unify all Islamic countries into a single Islamic state or Caliphate”), including 49% of “moderate” Indonesian Muslims. The internal validity of these data about the present longing for a Caliphate is strongly suggested by a concordant result: 65.5% of this Muslim sample approved the proposition “To require a strict [emphasis added] application of Shari’a law in every Islamic country.”

Notwithstanding ahistorical drivel from Western Muslim “advocacy” groups such as the Muslim Association of Britain, which lionizes both the Caliphate and the concomitant institution of Shari’a as promulgators of “a peaceful and just society” , the findings from the University of Maryland/ WorldPublicOpinion.org poll are ominous.

Now, this call to unite the Islamic world is just one part of a larger concept. First, the conquest of Europe.

Britain is not alone in its Muslim plight. In 2005, France experienced massive Muslim riots in 300 cities. Public buildings were firebombed, 200 policemen were injured, and 4,000 were arrested.[2] This is not unusual as a Muslim response to perceived offenses. Remember the Danish cartoons?

The central problem is assimilation. Most Muslims don’t move to a country with the purpose of becoming real citizens of that country. Muslims don’t want to be British or French. Muslims come for the wealth of the west, and to make the west Muslim. The evidence is transparent to anyone paying attention. The Parisian riots of 2005 were committed by second and third generation children of Muslim immigrants.

The ultimate aspiration of Muslims is total, global dominion within a theocracy known as a “caliphate.” Be they peaceful Muslims or radical Muslims, all share in this goal.

The problem of Muslim integration is so sensitive that 751 areas have been willingly ceded to Islamic residents by the French government. Called “no-go zones” by many, these areas are off-limits to non-Muslims who value their lives. The UK is home to an indistinguishable number of “no-go zones,” with violence toward non-Muslims increasing in once peaceful areas.

Does this sound like a people that wishes to immigrate and assimilate? Or does this sound like a group that wants to take over? I think the evidence is rather clear.

The Reconquista:

While the Europeans are in a precarious situation with Islam, we in the US are not without our challenges. For details, kindly give this long excerpt from Human Events a read.

Radical ‘Reconquista’ Agenda

Behind the respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the real agenda of the La Raza movement, the agenda that led to those thousands of illegal immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican flags, brazenly defying our laws, and demanding concessions.

Key among the secondary organizations is the radical racist group Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West.

“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we…should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot…Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas … It became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” (Statement on University of Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3, 2006)

MEChA isn’t at all shy about their goals, or their views of other races. Their founding principles are contained in these words in “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlan” (The Spiritual Plan for Aztlan):

“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny. … Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. … We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan. For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”

That closing two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal rights for all. It says: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”

If these morally sickening MEChA quotes were coming from some fringe website, Americans could at least console themselves that it was just a small group of nuts behind it. Nearly every racial and ethnic group has some shady characters and positions in its past and some unbalanced individuals today claiming racial superiority and demanding separatism. But this is coming straight from the official MEChA sites at Georgetown University, the University of Texas, UCLA, University of Michigan, University of Colorado, University of Oregon, and many other colleges and universities around the country.

This plan is what is referred to as the “Reconquista” or reconquest, of the Western U.S.

But it won’t end with territorial occupation and secession. The final plan for the La Raza movement includes the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian descent out of “Aztlan.”

As Miguel Perez of Cal State-Northridge’s MEChA chapter has been quoted as saying: “The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlan. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once Aztlan is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled — opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep power.”

Former MEChA members include Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who was officially endorsed by La Raza for mayor and was awarded La Raza’s Graciela Olivarez Award. Now we know why he refuses to condemn a sea of foreign flags in his city. California Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante is also a former MEChA member. He delivered the keynote address at La Raza’s 2002 Annual Convention.

The National Council of La Raza and its allies in public office make no repudiation of the radical MEChA and its positions. In fact, as recently as 2003, La Raza was actively funding MEChA, according to federal tax records.(Emphasis mine)

Note that these quotes of from MECha; not from me, and not Human Events-their words-their plans. Their stated intent is to “retake” the southwestern US, and then “remove” all other races. How this “cleansing” will occur remains to be seen. If we use history as our guide, can we predict that this “cleansing” might result in millions of deaths? After all, most communist takeovers are followed by a massive bloodletting, as anyone who might resist are killed.

Some will say that this is an extreme “fringe.” I must disagree. As the article from Human Events points out, MECha has chapters all over the country. They are vocal in their intent. While we cannot determine the full numbers, just as we cannot determine the exact number of illegals in this country, we can safely guess that there are many thousands, if not millions of people that are here illegally, and have no interest in joining our society.

Here is a map that shows the distribution of Hispanics in the US.

One can say that they are simply staying near the border, but compare the above map to the map of Aztlan.

Notice the similarities there?

The Verdict:

It’s very clear that the two groups discussed here are openly stating their intention to take over territory, at first, by infiltration, and then, use any means necessary to secure their power.

In the 30’s, both Hitler and Mussolini stated their intent to expand. Mussolini stressed a new Roman Empire. Hitler, at least initially, looked to regain territory lost at Versailles, as well as to “restore” German populated areas to greater Germany. No one took them seriously, and then were shocked when they did what they said they were going to do in the first place.

If we ignore the two groups described in this post, do we risk a similar disaster? History has repeatedly shown that when potential tyrants are ignored, they can, and sometimes do, become literal tyrants.

I think it is also important to discuss that not all people in either group will participate in repression, violence, or even genocide and other crimes against humanity. Once again, let history be our guide. In the 30’s and 40’s, not every German was a Nazi. Not every Italian was with Mussolini. However, the majorities in those countries decided to simply “go along” with fascism. They thought that their lives were getting better, and they just looked the other way when the Jews, homosexuals, gypsies, and political dissidents “disappeared.” They chose to ignore the riots and the beatings of those that spoke out. They chose to ignore the trains filled with people going by. They chose to ignore the smokestacks that belched funny smelling smoke. They chose to ignore that Hitler was only doing what he SAID he was going to do. That’s what might happen in the US and in Europe. There are many Hispanics here in the US (Including one of our own contributors, AG) that came here legally, love this country, and will fight (rhetorically or literally) at our side. There are also MANY others that might not participate in violence, but they won’t fight it, and may assist it with their silence and complacency.

That is the danger that we face here. Too many Americans are ignoring the stated threat from the people from MECha and La Raza. And, just like in the fascist states, will people not wake up until it is too late?

While it seems grim, we are not yet lost. People are waking up. We can still communicate openly, and expose those that would enslave or kill us. We are still armed, and therefore able to defend ourselves. No, I’m not advocating an armed conflict with illegals, I’m instead discussing the reality that people tend not to openly attack an armed populace. It may not entirely stop an armed insurrection, but it would limit the damage. I say this with history in mind as well. To quote Adm. Yamamoto…

“You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”

But what of Europe? They are facing a far more grave situation. They are largely more socialistic in their governments. Their populace, by in large, is disarmed. Political correctness has a greater foothold there, and those that do speak out are slammed as racists. In some European countries, I would face the risk of arrest for quoting the movements that I did in this very post.

In the end, I fear that Europe is already lost. If they dared to defend themselves against attack by an Islamic nation, their Islamic populations could likely rise up in rebellion. With a disarmed populace, the slaughter would be horrific. Their governments, I don’t think, would have the will to keep their nations intact. In the war scenario, they would not be able to protect their own people and infrastructure as well as mount of meaningful defense, let alone an offense. They could collapse under attack from without and within. There simply would not be a coherent culture strong enough, or even willing, to defend itself. The end game scenario would be an Islamic Europe, with the British and French nuclear arsenals in the hands of jihadists.

Even is the status quo remains, the cruel mathematics of demographics would take it’s toll, and the result will be exactly the same. Frankly, I can see no solution to the European dilemma. I hope I’m wrong.

It’s not a pretty picture, but at least the US can be saved, if we can seal our borders and deal with the problem of illegal immigration by the rule of law. If we fail to do this, maps will change, and there is a real danger of a massive loss of life.

What I really fear is that our own government will continue its negligence, and fail to follow the most important Constitutional mandate: To protect us from foreign threats. In that event, it will be up to us to protect ourselves. While we could do that, it would lead to many unnecessary deaths.

SampleImage