Bind Him Down From Mischief
Will we ever get a response from the Republicans?
Keith Theodore Olbermann
Yes! Where’s the birth certificate?
“We’ve got to be careful about what we say about each other sometimes, because it boxes us in in ways that makes it difficult for us to work together because our constituents start believing us, So just a tone of civility instead of slash-and-burn would be helpful.”
Barack Hussein Obama
Baltimore, MD. Januay 29, 2010.
Obama needs to take his own advice, considering his dismal breach of protocol two nights ago, when he castigated the Supreme Court during his State of the Union Speech .
The Republican Party made a poor showing at the SOTU, with John McCain and his boyfriend, Lindsey Graham, featured center stage and all but holding hands, whispering to each other like two degenerate Roman senators.
Two nights later, it was Storybook Time with Obama in Baltimore, where he entered the lion’s den to play both Daniel and David at the same time, facing off with 140 Republicans, who played sheep to Obama’s wolf, when they should have been piranas.
He resembled the snake oil salesman “Slick Willie,” as Chris “I forgot he was black” Matthews called him “Clintonesque.”
MSNBC pundit, Chris Matthews, waxed nostalgic about Obama’s “charm, poetry and prose.” It wasn’t like John McCain seeing only KGB, but Comrade Obama made a compelling case for Marxism with his down home affability which beguiles. He is indeed charming; this writer will give him that.
The Republican Party rubes swallowed the Obama presentation, offering only mild protest to the “president.”
“I’m not a pundit, I’m president…” said Obama. “Questions” remain, regarding that assertion.
Rep. Mike Pence got side-tracked, talking of the advocacy of the Kennedy administration for tax cuts, when he should have been asking the hard question regarding Obama’s failure to enforce John F. Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110, abolishing the Federal Reserve. Obama came into office presenting himself as the New Messiah, and heir to Camelot. Where’s the beef, oh Great Mahdi?
Obama claims–in his “all-knowing” arrogance– that the American people want both sides of the aisle to work together, to “get this done.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Americans love the blood-sport of politics, just as much as the liberals like to be smug. They will devour their own kind, if that kind fails to deliver.
The “Party Which Can’t Shoot Straight,” is still facing an identity crisis, as it has completely fractured, leaving only neoconservatives to man the fortress gates.
January 29th is the night the GOP paraded out all of the green, tender shoots, to stand against the hurricane of one liberal mouse, who roared. Where was the old growth presidential timber, which does not sway in the wind?
The spectacle of failure, provided by the Republican Party in Baltimore was reminiscent of how the Germans enlisted old men, women and children, during the final hours of the Third Reich, for the defense of Berlin.
Why was Rep. Ron Paul not there, or at least someone approaching his exalted stature?
This writer did not recognize any conservative of note beyond Mike Pence at the Baltimore President’s Question Time.
MSNBC pundit Chris “I love to eviscerate an opponent” Matthews, who covered the event, wanted to know “why the Republicans want to shut down the recovery.”
This is the guy who is now advertising over the airwaves how he likes an intellectual challenge, and then proceeds to move in for the kill. What a braggart and boaster!
Well, let me see…could it be that it might be time to do a “comprehensive reform” on our banking system, and forget about reforming Mexican interlopers?
Seven hundred billion dollars of borrowed money was good for a hot-rush heroin injection of a stimulus package, but the government is addicted to the drug of easy credit, and the staggering amount of seven hundred billion dollars was not enough to “get the fix.”
The American people have a different definition of “recovery” and it involves weaning ourselves from the dangerous narcotic of easy credit and entering “rehab” with the creation of a sound monetary system. Too bad there was no lion among the Republican sheep who confronted the “president” in Baltimore. They could have called Obama’s bluff and said: “Indeed let us in a bipartisan manner dissolve the Federal Reserve, before it dissolves our country.” What would have been the response of the alleged “Heir of Camelot, who is also the protégé of Zbigniew Brzezinski , George Soros and David Rockefeller?
The “Party of No,” was too busy being polite to Obama, to articulate a position.
“President’s Question Time” could have introduced the question related to the issue of how the American people can save their country, which has fallen victim to usury.
Obama struck a pose on the world stage as the Black JFK, but he did NOT stand and deliver Camelot to the American people, by dissolving the Fed, as JFK did before he was murdered.
Chris Matthews wondered why the Republican Party was not “saddened” by the unemployment of Americans. There’s an old saying: “Never assume…”
Conservatives must ask the same question, as to why Obama is not saddened, to be giving American jobs to Haitians and Mexican nationals.
Obama introduced his favorite word into the debates, “transparent,” and yet nothing remains transparent about this community organizer from Chicago, except that he refuses– in his arrogance– to surrender to the American people his birth and school records.
There is no paper trail on this man, as he has spent over a million dollars on lawyers to block investigation as to whether he is indeed qualified for the job he sits in.
Small wonder the American people are unhappy with a man who accuses the Republican Party of “setting a tone,” when he has surrounded himself with a mantle of secrecy, and then claims to be “transparent.” Black Americans have a name for this kind of individual: “JAMF.”
The American people do NOT see a “transformational figure,” but instead we find ourselves the recipients of central planning, under a central bank.
Obama said in Baltimore: “We need to make ‘emergency decisions’ about the economy.” Why then does he continue to kite hot checks of funny money from the Federal Reserve?
How does he reconcile fiscal responsibility, with enslaving the American people to a counterfeiting operation?
“A civilization based on a system of parasitic usury economics will ultimately destroy itself, because fractional-reserve ‘banking’, combined with compound ‘interest’, is truly and totally contrary to the modern ‘Establishment’ economic theory that it represents some kind of perpetual-motion machine. Our economic system was not designed to, nor was it intended to, function honorably for the benefit and general prosperity of all; it was specifically designed to create a nation of debt slaves under the control of a molesting central bank. The perpetrators of the system understand fully that it is finite and must inevitably collapse in a state of insoluble debt, but by that point they expect to have gained full and indisputable control over everything. The 450 richest people in the world have financial assets equal to the combined wealth of the 3 billion poorest; half of all humanity. The only possible explanation for this is that the international economic system has been subverted and corrupted by fully intentional activities, directed towards undermining national governments and creating institutionalized, privately-owned central banks throughout the world.”
- [Anonymous]
Obama claims that Republicans “leave no room to negotiate with me,” and that the GOP perceives his agenda, as some sort of “Bolshevik plot.”
The actions of this administration show that there is legitimate cause for this perception, with the federal takeover of the auto industry, AIG and the bailouts of Fannie and Freddie.
Why doesn’t Obama make the emergency decision to save our country from absorption by the international bankers? Why doesn’t he make an emergency decision to evict the Mexican occupation army from American soil, when that army of squatters is also draining our economy, while it annexes our country as an act of war?
Remember this is “President’s Question Time!”
This underlying query–far more important than Obama’s citizenship question–remains the single most important issue which occupies the collective mind of the American people.
Chris Matthews of MSNBC said in his analysis of the SOTU, that U.S. Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell was “sitting on his keister,” giggling like a fool. Apparently this was a projection on the part of Matthews, as McConnell brought to the fore a most interesting point in his statement on the State of the Union Speech:
“The administration could also reassure Americans who are still rattled by the attempted Christmas Day bombing by vowing to make a priority of preventing the next terrorist attack, not treating captured terrorists like common criminals so we can place them in a civilian court. Americans have a right to find out everything captured terrorists know in order to prevent future terrorist attacks.”
In answer to Obama: There is “no room to negotiate” when the people do NOT recognize the legitimacy of the Obama administration on personal, domestic and international decisions.
“It can’t be all or nothing,” said Obama, when referring to health care, but the financial health of the nation is at stake, and it is indeed an “all or nothing proposition.”
Obama left out many important points during his SOTU, the most glaring one being Ron Paul’s effort to End the Fed. It is pointless to discuss jobs, budgets and the like, when our government is under the boot of usury. Obama came into office proclaiming the revival of Camelot, but failed to enforce John F. Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110, abolishing the Federal Reserve. That makes him a poser, with a strong sense of self-entitlement. He has NOT earned a rapport with the opposing political party, nor the American people.
“After 11 months of health care monomania, he said Wednesday that “jobs must be our No. 1 focus.” Unemployment is 10 percent.” George Will
Speaking of Obama’s statement where he lectures Republicans about “making political assertions that aren’t substantiated and selling the American people a ‘bill of goods:’”
How does Obama answer the question regarding his administration’s Civil Rights Division, which he claims is prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination?
Why has his administration NOT prosecuted the Black Panthers who were caught on tape intimidating voters during the presidential election process?
Rather than prosecuting civil rights violations, the Obama Justice Department is seeking to evade subpoenas from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is investigating the incident.
“At what point do we have a serious conversation?
Barack Hussein Obama
Over at MSNBC the liberal talking heads want to know why the newly-elected governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell, with only twelve days on the job, was in charge of the Republican response to the SOTU. The liberals have a point; too many points, in fact.
Is this all the Republican Party could come up with; green wood, nobody has ever heard of? Why was Ron Paul not enlisted to speak?
Pundits over at MSNBC are lavishly praising what amounts to a mediocre State of the Union address, delivered by the Usurper-in-Chief.
The political pablum of the Obama address, is already being hailed as a major milestone in State of the Union speeches at MSNBC where there is talk of firing up the jackhammers on Mount Rushmore, to further the apotheosis of Barack Hussein Obama.
“Will the Republicans take the dare of going against the banks?” Keith Theodore Olbermann asked in his SOTU analysis.
“Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there’s one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it’s that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal.”
Barack Hussein Obama
If Obama “hated it” so much, why did he borrow a trillion dollars to bailout an obvious Ponzi scheme? This is leadership?
This passage should have read: “Our most urgent task upon taking office, was to fulfill the mandate laid down by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson , Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy to return control of the nation’s purse strings to the American people.
This struggle of our founding fathers for debt-free money, was the cause of the Revolutionary war, and once again we find our republic under full frontal assault from the international bankers.
I promised this nation the return of Camelot, upon my inauguration, and I fully intend to keep that promise, by immediately putting John F. Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110– abolishing the Federal Reserve– into full force.
I will end the Federal Reserve, before it ends this republic.”
Where is Lloyd Bentsen, when we need him to tell Obama that he is NOT Jack Kennedy?
Rep. Ron Paul actually introduced a bill for a total audit of the Federal Reserve quite some time ago. Rep. Paul’s solution to the economic problems of this country, is the only one worthy of consideration, for it falls into alignment with presidents Lincoln and Kennedy, who were murdered for trying to free the American people from the yoke of serfdom under usury.
MSNBC anchor, Keith Olbermann, accuses Republicans of “reading too many of your own blogs.” Perhaps we should read their blogs?
When Republicans played the President’s Storybook Time game, they were accused of being “freebooters, taking shots at the president,” by MSNBC news anchor, Chris Matthews.
The assessment by Matthews, aligns with Obama’s definition of “No room to negotiate.”
The home team got mauled on their own playground, by a featherweight.
Keith Olbermann compared Obama’s Baltimore coup to the historic pugilist, John L. Sullivan, offering to beat up everyone in the room.
Obama tells us there is a cost for healthcare. Does that cost include the deportation of illegal aliens, who have bankrupted our hospitals?
Our ship of state has been torpedoed by the central bankers on the high seas of international finance and all this republic can do, is tread water in shark-infested seas, in the hope that our bid for rescue by solvency–in borrowing another trillion dollars– will cloak us like a protecting oil slick against the corporate carcharodon.
The key to realizing the state of our Union, is in understanding the vulnerability of the dollar in the global currency markets. The Obama administration may be able to fool the American people for a time, with “hope” pep talks, and fireside chats, but the ultimate reality is that gullible Americans are NOT the sophisticated foreign investors who are currently propping up this republic. These foreign investors are getting ready to pull the plug on the hopeless deadbeat this country has become.
The stability of our economy, is now subject to around-the-clock electronic financial transactions, which could lead to Obama’s “stability” being wiped out at the speed of light on a computer screen.
The task of paramount importance for the American people, is to take control of their financial destiny–and republic– by ending the Fed.
This issue was NOT discussed by the solons and august personalities, during President’s Question Time.
Usury acts like heroin in the veins of the national body, and our elected representatives are addicted to kiting hot checks, to get a stimulus rush, leading to the twilight realm.
I will close my analysis of Obama’s three day binge over the airwaves, with a message from our real president:
“But if rejection of Bernanke would cause turmoil in U.S. and world markets, what does that say about the real stability of the system? And is it not time we stopped treating the Fed as a holy of holies?
In 1913, when the Fed was created with the duty of preserving the dollar, one 20-dollar bill could buy one 20-dollar gold piece. Fifty 20-dollar bills are needed today to buy one 20-dollar gold piece. Under the Fed’s custody, the U.S. dollar has lost 98 percent of its value.
Against the euro, in the George W. Bush decade, the dollar lost close to half its value.
The dollar is the storehouse of our wealth. Has the Fed faithfully safeguarded that storehouse? Was it not Thomas Jefferson who taught us, “In questions of power let us hear no more of trust in men, but bind them down from mischief with the chains of the Constitution”?
Every monetary crisis is a result of Fed action or inaction, for the Fed controls the money supply. As Milton Friedman wrote in the book that won him a Nobel, the Fed’s easy money fueled the market bubble that burst in 1929. In our time, the Fed fueled the dot-com bubble, the stock market bubble and the housing bubble. Bubbles appear when money is created faster than the supply of goods that money buys.
This populist uprising is a product of rage and revulsion at the Washington and Wall Street elites, the unindicted co-conspirators who created this crisis, neither of which has paid a price commensurate with what they did to the country.
Let this rebellion not end until all receive their just desserts, and we get real “change we can believe in.”
Patrick J. Buchanan
Keith Olbermann gloated over the ineptness of the Republican response in Baltimore, by projecting that Republicans will now be too intimidated to deal with a president who can ad lib it without a teleprompter, when he said: “Republicans will say: ‘We have to avoid him as much as possible.’”
“You’re always learning from your enemies”
Chris Matthews
Walk away, Republicans, then come back and take Troy!
© Thor H. Asgardson

Category: Politics



Link to this page































[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Hans von der Gruen, Matt Ross. Matt Ross said: Bind Him Down From Mischief http://ff.im/-f805w [...]