Author: Clay Bowler on December 12th, 2009

The Global Warming Agenda: More Controls of Your Freedom

As Copenhagen COP 15 UN Climate Summit drags on, the agenda of global warming is becoming clear. Even as the Hadley CRU e-mails show questions concerning the ethics of the science, the global warming fear mongers continue to shape policy which will rob you or your freedoms.

As we know in the United States, the first major freedom rob will be more money taken from you in the form of taxes centered around cap and trade. This will be followed by other taxes which tax your movements and your personal carbon output. There is so much more coming in the years following if the people of the United States comply and forget about their Constitution while allowing the United States government to acquire such power.

A Canadian newspaper is now celebrating China’s efforts with their one-child policy. They overlook the cruelty of how female babies are often abused and left to die when the parents push for male children. Diane Francis that the world’s population must be lowered by at least a billion people according to ‘intelligence.’ She writes:

The world’s other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity’s soaring reproduction rate.

Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world’s leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.

The intelligence behind this is the following:

-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world’s population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.

-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world’s forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.

-Doing nothing, by contrast, will result in an unsustainable population of nine billion by 2050.

Of course she offers no valid reasons why the earth couldn’t support 9 billion people. When you consider all the food that is currently wasted around the world, it would be easy to make the argument that with careful planning the earth could support 9 billion people.

In college, I was told by an instructor, that the entire earth’s population standing side by said would take up the space of the metropolitan area of Houston. When you fly over the United States, you realize how much open land (including farm land there is). I am just not buying this agenda. This is agenda is designed to give the government more control of your life. The taxes they are about to impose will force people into having less children.

Here’s another area that government wants to control you. How you eat! Eating is now considered dangerous to the climate. So the English government is encouraging its citizens to eat less meat and more veggies. Now does this make any sense?

Let’s see, from what I was told plants consume CO2 to conduct photo synthesis. They should be friends of the global warming advocates because they do help lower CO2 levels. They aren’t telling you to save the veggies. No, they are asking people to stop eating meat. Why? Well because animals produce greenhouse gasses because they exhale and they fart.

Now may I ask a question of common sense here? If animals are so dangerous the to climate, then why do we care about whether the polar bears live or not? They produce CO2 and they fart adding to the green house gasses. This makes no sense to me whatsoever other than the polar bears are being used by global warming advocates for meaningless pathos. We have to save the polar bears mommy!

An British government report generated from the office of climate hack Lord Stern reads: To fight climate change and tackle the growing crisis of diet-related diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer, British consumers must cut down on meat and dairy produce, reduce their intake of processed foods and curb waste.

If we cut down on the meat we eat, that means there will be more CO2 producers breathing. Animals will overpopulate and add to the problems mentioned above. This should be common sense too. This isn’t that hard to see the silliness of their arguments here. It’s not about climate change. It never has been. It’s about controlling the people, which is why every aspect of your life is under attack from these people, and they continue to lie to enforce their pseudo science which many stand to make billions from.

Originally posted at Bungalow Bill’s Conservative Wisdom © Clay Bowler

GHTime Code(s): e9848 3a9e6