The Fairness (?) Doctrine and the Constitution By Doug Edelman
“I, Loyal Citizen of the Republic, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
Every legislator elected to the US Senate and House of Representatives takes this oath upon their installation into that office. They obligate themselves to “support and defend” the constitution of the United States and “bear true faith and allegiance” to it.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
This is the complete text of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
Please note Congress shall make NO LAW… abridging the freedom of speech.
Hmm.
Haven’t we heard a lot recently from a lot of Democratic legislators who are looking to find a “legislative solution” to the “problem” of “talk radio”? Didn’t Feinstein recently complain that Talk Radio is home to “extremists” and “right wingers”? Didn’t Reid compare Conservative Talk Radio to PORNOGRAPHY? Isn’t the “fairness doctrine” all about regulating the CONTENT of speech?
The moment the CONTENT of talk radio becomes an issue for lawmakers who want to legislate to control it – does this not fly in the face of the First Amendment’s very clear text that Congress SHALL MAKE NO LAW… abridging the freedom of speech?
Ah, but the proponents of regulation will claim that talk radio makes use of the public airwaves under license and has an obligation to “serve the public interest”. But is it not in the public interest to provide a counterbalance to viewpoints which pervade the print and television media?
The so-called “Fairness Doctrine” is anything but. Rather than foster open debate, broadcasters frequently avoid political issues entirely rather than have to walk to tightrope of government regulations on equal time etc. This STIFLES debate rather than allowing the current open forums.
When the Fairness Doctrine was put in place, there were three broadcast TV networks, and few national radio programs. Equal Time enabled access to the media for opposing viewpoints.
In this day and age of broadcast radio, satellite radio, HD radio, Internet radio, broadcast TV, Cable/Satellite TV etc – there is no shortage of access to the airwaves for ANY viewpoint. The free market determines the ratings share. Rush Limbaugh is the most listened to radio talkshow host in America . Sean Hannity is second and Glenn Beck is third. Al Franken’s Air America went bust because there is no market for what they were spouting… but they had no difficulty getting access to the airwaves… their problem was in PAYING for it.
Conservative BOOKS tend to go straight to the top of the NY Times Bestsellers List. The public votes with their dollars. Nowadays, with the advent of desktop publishing, the proliferation of Vanity Press services, and outlets like Amazon.com… ANYONE can produce and market a book. But the market drives the popularity of opinion books, and the conservative market is strong, despite some booksellers attempts to “back shelf” certain titles.
The fact of the matter is that the moment the CONTENT of talk radio becomes part of a legislative debate or intent to act… the legislators have taken leave of their oath to bear allegiance to the Constitution – specifically to the First Amendment. Congress has no place even debating the CONTENT of FREE SPEECH!
Sadly, our current crop of legislators is not just on the wrong track… they’ve derailed. Let’s just hope that if the Fairness Doctrine becomes law, it is challenged and reaches SCOTUS before Obama can further stack the deck!
Copyright © 2008 by Doug Edelman
Doug Edelman is a conservative political commentator and has been a contributing editor for The Conservative Voice. His work is also seen on News By Us, The American Daily, The Post Chronicle, New Media Journal, Capitol Hill Coffee House etc. For the support of his family, however, he is also an IT Consultant/Contractor and owner of a Computer Services Business. He has taught PC Maintenance & Repair and Networking at his local Community College, and maintains a blog at http://edeldoug.blogs.com/.
Print This Post
Last 3 posts by Doug Edelman
- Final Thoughts on the Bush Presidency – Hail and Farewell to the Chief! - January 1st, 2009
- An Open Letter to the Electors of the Electoral College - December 13th, 2008
- The Fairness (?) Doctrine and the Constitution - November 19th, 2008
Possibly Related Posts:
- A FEDERAL REGULATION VERSUS A MEDIA CIRCUS
- The Civil War Negates Secession: Is It Possible to Control the Power of the Federal Government?
- Technological Parking Meters Manifest Statist Mindset
- Congress To Get Raise ! You’re Kidding, Right?
- Goebbels, Paterson, Obama and the eternal lie
Sphere: Related Content




