CNN Promotes “Obama”; McCain Promotes Amnesty; Who Promotes America? By Nicholas Stix
Patriotic voters continue to find themselves bedeviled by two opponents: The MSM, and the Republican standard-bearer.
On September 15, CNN aired a campaign advertorial for the man who presently calls himself “Barack Obama”* (Race-IL). The organization presented the advertorial as a news report, but I doubt they fooled anyone. After all, if you watch CNN, you’re likely a socialist or a communist, in which case you would vote for Sen. Dunham/Soetoro/Obama, even if he were filmed killing and devouring human babies raw. Alternatively, you’re opposed to him, and are watching for the entertainment value or because you’re a political junkie. (No Republican politician would ever sink to the level of depravity of eating human babies raw; a GOP pol would first cook the babies. Gov. Sarah Palin (Pioneer Women-AK), however, wrestles grizzly bears to the death, and eats them raw.)
Wolf Blitzer was the host, with most or all of the out-of-studio commentary supplied by Democratic operative Dana Bash King, who is married to Democratic operative John King, who is also stationed at CNN. The ad bashed Sen. John McCain (Media-AZ) and Palin. It claimed that experts on the Right and Left alike had denounced McCain’s newest political ad as dishonest, and Dana King emphasized of Palin, “And what she says is carefully scripted with teleprompter.”
What Sen. Barack Hussein “Obama” says is also carefully scripted with teleprompter, but Dana King forgot to mention that.
The “conservative” expert in question was Karl Rove. I wonder what angle Rove was working by attacking McCain?
I tried unsuccessfully to find Dana King’s ad at CNN’s web site, but did find another “Obama” advertorial that said,
Obama has rejected public financing, calling the system “broken” — a decision that frees him to continue raising money for November.
McCain has accepted federal matching funds for his general election campaign, giving him $84 million to spend for November. The money comes with strict spending limits, but the Republican National Committee’s victory fund can continue to raise and spend money on his behalf.”
Well, not exactly. The truth of the matter is that D/S/O supported public financing, until he opposed it. Public campaign financing is a fundamental principle of the Democratic Party, and D/S/O dutifully supported it, until he saw that he was getting more money in contributions than he would via public financing and “evolved” beyond such “principles.” But you won’t learn that from CNN, which also took pains to minimize the significance of McCain’s acceptance of public financing.
Later in the week, on Thursday I believe, I caught another CNN campaign contribution to the “Obama” campaign. An attractive young Democratic operative claimed that CNN staffers worked 24/7 to check the respective campaigns’ claims. She then read through a list of such claims and found that, wonder of wonders, all of “Obama’s” claims were true, while all of McCain’s were false!
The job requirements for the aforementioned operative were that she be socialist, attractive, female and able to read a teleprompter. Heck, she’d qualify to be president, if only she were about eight years older.
D/S/O’s media operatives have been so despicable in their twisting of reality on behalf of The One that recently I caught myself feeling sorry for McCain. That feeling lasted until I read a new series of blogs by VDARE writer, Patrick Cleburne, on McCain’s Hispandering and intention to pass an amnesty for the over 20 million illegal immigrants presently in the country, plus every “cousin” they can bring in through family reunification and chain migration. And since then, as VDARE’s Brenda Walker reports, on September 15, in a bid to outhispander “Obama,” McCain pledged on Spanish-language, Mexican nationalist TV channel Univision that if elected, he will present an amnesty plan for illegal immigrants “in the first day.” (Univision host/Mexican nationalist Jorge Ramos refers to amnesty by the euphemism, “comprehensive immigration reform”; McCain uses the euphemism, “a path to citizenship.”)
Univision’s Jorge Ramos: Senator Barack Obama told us in an interview that he would present a comprehensive immigration reform to congress during the first year. Could you match that?
McCain: Sure, I would do it in the first day, but I was the one who led, I was the one who led with Senator (Ted) Kennedy, a great political risk to myself. Senator Obama tried to kill it, because he was doing what the unions wanted. The unions in America do not want a temporary worker program, so Senator Obama came to the floor and had an amendment that would have basically killed immigration reform, because it was a fragile coalition between republicans and democrats. So, don’t let Senator Obama get away with saying that he supports comprehensive reform, when he tried to kill it.
(Full disclosure: I am also a VDARE contributor see also here)
And so, I’m back to Square One, with the alternative of voting for a third party candidate, or making my undervote count.
Hey, Sen. McCain, I hope you’re enjoying the bitter fruits of all those years sucking up to the socialist MSM. Don’t say I didn’t warn you!
*When “Obama” was a citizen of Indonesia during his Moslem childhood, while living with his Moslem Indonesian stepfather, his legal name was “Barry Soetoro,” but since his parents’ marriage was bigamous, and thus invalid, his proper legal surname would be Dunham, his mother’s maiden name.
Print This Post
Last 3 posts by Nicholas Stix
- Pearl Harbor Day and the selection of Barack Obama - December 9th, 2008
- “Mumbai” and Other Multicultural Mumbo Jumbo - December 1st, 2008
- Invisible Victims - The Winchester Atrocity - November 28th, 2008
Possibly Related Posts:
- How Do You Say, “Pay for Play” In Spanish?
- Final Thoughts on the Bush Presidency – Hail and Farewell to the Chief!
- Bipartisanship is the LAST Thing the US Congress Needs
- Barney’s Basement Man Whores: Barney Frank is Offended
- America Needs To Regain Control Of Her Congress. Here’s How.
Sphere: Related Content






Comment by james messina on 23 September 2008:
Regardless of what is written about Obama doesn’t mean it is true. What is true is “what comes out of the mouth the heart is full of” and we hear what Obama says and we can judge his heart accordingly.
Our biggest problem now aside from energy is terrorism (if we fix our energy we fix the economy) and there’s two ways to address terror, offensively or defensively. Both face the same tossup war or peace. Education is the key, why radical Islam hates us. Talking and listening with our enemies and allies spending money on the schools that will prevent the teaching of radical Islam and at the same time be sensitive to the ancient customs of the Arab nations and leave diversity the role it needs to play. I am an American that lived in Israel ten years near a Arab neighborhood (Bethlehem) and I know how Arab-Israeli (Arabs that were born in Israel) and Palestinians (Arabs who were born outside usually Jordan) and have an understanding how both think. The more violence we will use against this Holy War, the more they are given the right to use terror.
We need a president who understands this. Obama is a man who does.
Comment by james messina on 22 September 2008:
Last election these crowds that one could still hear echoing “four more years!” that resonated and ultimately stirred a winning cause, was based on Bush would do better in time of war. Did they forget the attracts happened on his watch?
I keep hearing polls insinuating McCain would do better in war because of his experience. Let’s reverse the situation. Who would do better making peace? Better yet. Who would do better in preventing war? Who is the best ticket on talks with our Arab and Muslim friends, McCain-Palin or Obama-Biden? Education is the key here, all nations learning from each other in a give and take of important attitude and feelings. One thing is certain, in the Muslim culture; it is easier for men to converse with each other rather then man and women that’s where Biden has the advantage over Palin. On the same token a man who cries fire (“I would fire him”) is a scary image of McCain’s hand slamming down on a big red button yelling “fire!” Our friends and allies of the Arab and Muslim nations would apt to have a better rapport with Obama